English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

or is this just another not so clever attempt to distract the world from what the real story is

2007-12-28 03:27:43 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

if they have post a link . except a link to fox news....

2007-12-28 03:32:29 · update #1

also a pakistan intellegnece report will not prove a thing

2007-12-28 03:35:40 · update #2

again AL-queda has not said a thing only the usa and pakistan

2007-12-28 03:36:19 · update #3

14 answers

When Mr.Bush tells them to.

2007-12-28 03:46:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

From what I've read no one has accepted responsibility for the death of Bhutto. The suicide bomber that killed himself has been identified and has connections with al Qaeda. A terrorist group will eventually accept responsibility for her death. She was a major political figure and her death would be badge of honor to the people who killed her.

2007-12-28 03:41:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i do no longer agree, or a minimum of i does no longer rule it out. i think of that the continued instability in Pakistan can in basic terms improve the Al-Queda stream. we would desire to continually additionally undergo in innovations that the Taliban (whom she as quickly as supported) might additionally income from the dying of a destiny best Minister who does no longer acquire back-handers from the Afghan government. we would desire to continually additionally undergo in innovations that Bhutto's previous isn't precisely suitable. She has been accused of corruption; and whilst no longer something exchange into ever shown, it brought about her to flee her united states of america on 2 events. whilst I condemn the killing of Benazir Bhutto, I might desire to declare that for the time of this unhappy day, that's purely the suitable of a foul bunch that has been assassinated.

2016-10-09 07:39:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't trust the world media or Al-Queda.

2007-12-28 04:22:47 · answer #4 · answered by J.B. Holiday 6 · 1 0

Maybe they're not responsible. Where was the security promised by Mushaaref? Why didn't they protect her? Did they let her be killed? 1000 questions; 0 answers! Just the way it always is.

2007-12-28 03:37:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Who knows? But it is fairly evident it was them or Taliban, or some group that knows that Democracy would be bad for them. Besides Fox is still news no matter what some think.

2007-12-28 03:37:12 · answer #6 · answered by SFC_Ollie 7 · 1 2

What makes you think that Al-Quaeda is involved?
What good does it make for "them"?

And what's the "real" story?

2007-12-28 04:00:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They have taken the responsibility, it is in CNN and BBC World.

2007-12-28 03:35:30 · answer #8 · answered by Aris 3 · 1 0

Al- qaeda doesn't exist - but the NWO does!

2007-12-28 03:37:50 · answer #9 · answered by John M 4 · 1 1

But...But But.......

I thought the DNC spin was that BUSH did it!!!!!!

How could a nice group of peaceful muslims do such a nasty thing!

2007-12-28 03:32:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers