Ladies - what do you prefer: circumcized or not?

Question

Apparently, circumcision is more often done in the US than anywhere else on earth. Jews and Muslims are routinely circumcised - but most men aren't. For those of you ladies who have been with both types, which do you prefer and why? Thanks.

Answer 1

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...

How many times has this been asked, seriously?

Answer 2

OK haven't been with both types only intact and the foreskin is clearly an important part and I don't know why people would want it gone. The bias towards circumcision yes only tends to be in those people in the US, Muslims and Jews. Also even if women prefer it that is good for them but no reason for it to be done to an unconsenting baby.

Answer 3

I've been with both, and intact is much more enjoyable. But a man is more than a penis, and a relationship is more than just sex, so the quality of the sexual relationship should not be the only factor in a relationship. But sex with a guy who has been circumcised is not terribly enjoyable for the woman compared to sex with a guy who still has all his man parts. If I were to decide on that basis only (which would be pretty shallow), I would definitely prefer uncircumcised.

Answer 4

Yes to both! Being an intact male I can clearly say that my wife and I both enjoy my foreskin because it's offered us the best of both worlds during sexual pleasure for the both of us. She has been with both circumcised and uncircumcised men before and what we have learned together is we can manipulate the situation to best fit our mood. If she wants to be with a circumcised partner or if I want to feel circumcised, we simply pull back my foreskin during foreplay, oral or while having intercourse. She gets the same pleasure acept for the caloused, rough and dried glans and I get the added exposed glans and inner foreskin stimulation with the assistance of some added lubrication. When we are in the uncircumcised mood, she or we pay close attention to the eroginous zones within the foreskin cap through foreplay (pulling, stretching, stroking, stuffing) or oral (nibbling, bitting, sucking or inserting the tongue) and intercourse (no added lubrication is ever needed).

Being uncircumcised clearly has it's best of both worlds advantages. As you can see, both can feel better to both parties but being uncircumcised, gives us far more avenues to venture down together and not to mention the prolonged hightened sensation we both get from it.

In my own experience and words, I can clearly tell you I am thankful to have been born and left intact. The sensation builds from the slightest touch, pulling or stretching and rolling of the foreskin as it slides up and down the shaft and back over to cover the glans. At the same time to feel the sensation as the frenulum (G-string) stretches on each downward stroke. Feeling the silky skin as it caresses and recovers the glans on each upward stroke. All combined and working together to give me complete sensory overload!

I was told from my parents that they left me intact so I could make my own circumcision decision. It wasn't easy for me growing up in a circ-society or era. Being the less than 5% I felt uneasy in the showers and on dates with inexperienced and unknowledgable women that I ended up one day getting a consultation for a circumcision. Experiencing the best of both worlds with my wife, I learned that it would have been a big mistake and irreversible to have gone through with the circumcision.

Why should there be a preference? Do men prefer their women to be circumcised or not?

Answer 5

Circumcised. It looks better and it's easier for men to keep clean.

Answer 6

I live in the US and am not Muslim nor Jewish and honestly I have never seen a penis that wasn't circumcised...

Answer 7

Not fussy. it's just a little bit of skin after all.

Answer 8

I've experienced both but prefer a man to be circumsized.