"Police Begin Fingerprinting on Traffic Stops"
If you're caught speeding or playing your music too loud, or other crimes for which you might receive a citation, Green Bay police officers will ask for your drivers license and your finger. You'll be fingerprinted right there on the spot. The fingerprint appears right next to the amount of the fine.
http://www.wbay.com/Global/story.asp?s=2776926
While it states you can refuse, how many will?
Is this a way to start on identifying those NOT in the felon, military, gun owners camps?
2007-12-28
00:56:38
·
20 answers
·
asked by
Cookies Anyone?
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Repub to the End...as Wis. is one of the most liberal states in the union, I doubt that. Though I don't support him or even think he's running the show, your BDS causes you to make stupid unjustified comments. This didn't start with Bush, nor will it end with him...I suggest you watch this video, so as to extract your cranial container from your anal orifice...
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-1QjXIHIweLFD5T2wUKs-?cq=1&p=130
2007-12-28
01:21:01 ·
update #1
Phil...that's the reason I deposit checks and NOT cash them...
2007-12-28
01:33:57 ·
update #2
Hi....read the article before making statements that are unsupported by it....
2007-12-28
02:25:32 ·
update #3
Wow. The government is really out of control, aren't they?
2007-12-28 01:00:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
It is scary, the intensifying movement towards a authoritarian police state. Whether or not you have or plan to do anything wrong or have anything to hide is NOT the point. For such minor offenses that is unnecessary and extreme. I am currently debating this very issue whereby someone I work with wants me to go get fingerprinted so that I can work with him on sites that requires contractors to be fingerprinted, etc. I am reluctant to do so because it goes against my core beliefs of privacy, etc and I know they will be in the FED database forever. I have not nor do I plan on breaking the law and I have nothing to hide, it a principals issue, unfortunately it involves making money which makes it a tough decision. I would definitely refuse a on minor traffic stop, and take my chances.
2007-12-28 01:56:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by HP 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
No! This is just another move towards a Police State.
"....and do not go into any kind of database; they simply stay on the ticket for future reference if the identity is challenged." If the prints don't go into a database, where is the information stored for "future reference"?
2007-12-28 01:09:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
Yeah......security.....blah, blah, blah...9/11....terrorism...blah, blah, blah.
They want your fingerprints on file somewhere, for whatever purpose occurs to them later on. I am naturally distrustful of leaving fingerprints anywhere.
As to how many will refuse? This is, or was, the United States, we have a right to refuse, but too many will be afraid of looking uncooperative. I wonder whats happened to us?
2007-12-28 01:15:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by justa 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
I agree with Amy. They wouldn't get my fingerprints. I never did anything to warrent them having my fingerprints so why start now? They don't need them!
2007-12-28 01:16:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
properly i think of there is distinctive diverse perspectives in this. the single maximum many times taught in severe colleges is a million. Hitler, although he grow to be a terrible and harsh man or woman, grow to be particularly persuasive and he knew the thank you to make insane, detrimental ideas appear like they made experience (I havn't study Mein Kompf (or "my conflict")yet i've got heard that's what this e book is approximately) and as quickly as people found out he grow to be rather loopy it grow to be too previous due. yet another excuse is after WWI Germany grow to be in a foul subject (debt, etc.) and Hitler style of pulled them out of that so that they regarded to him as a good chief. thoughts of prejudice additionally contributed. and a couple of. that's stated that on an identical time as the leaders of u . s . of america knew what grow to be occurring with the Holocaust, well-known individuals did no longer locate out till after the conflict (WWII). (And American had positioned the eastern in internment camps). It grow to be allowed to ensue in all probability with the aid of fact of the two information suggested above and it in all probability ought to've been stopped yet all of us is harsh and now and back don't have the terrific priorities yet all of it fairly is subjective. besides, what it comes right down to interior the tip is that Hitler grow to be a foul, evil, merciless and detrimental man or woman who did terrible issues to people. interior the tip he have been given what he deserved whilst he killed himself. most of the Nazis have been punished besides (interior the Nuremburg Trials) even although some, regrettably, weren't with the aid of fact the U. S. saved them in return for their centers as scientists and/or engineers (particularly people who designed gas chambers) to help interior the distance race with the Soviet Union. even although no longer something can atone for what the Jewish people (and the minority of persons besides) lost and suffered as a effect of the Holocaust. that's some thing that throughout no way ought to have occurred yet optimistically we can learn from the previous and forestall it from ever happening back, it fairly is why gaining know-how of history is so substantial regardless of each and every thing. wish that helped a sprint.
2016-11-25 22:23:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I remember the first time a teller at a bank asked me for my fingerprint when I went in to cash a check somebody had written to me....
I was stupefied. Could not BELIEVE it.
NO. I will NOT give my fingerprint for playing my damn music too loud.
Fvcking NAZI regime.
2007-12-28 01:03:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
What's next? DNA sample? Credit check?
2007-12-28 05:59:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by mazeman25 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
does this mean if you never committed a crime..your prints will be on file..for having a tail-light out?.
.Wisconsin that liberal bastion..the democrats and the patriot act working in concert?..
somehow I think that will be remembered when they rant about lost rights and Bush
2007-12-28 01:07:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
I would refuse. I have absolutely nothing to hide, but I would still make them get a warrant.
If you give up your liberties little by little, you disrespect how hard-won they were to begin with.
People died to give us our Constitution. For that, we need to preserve our rights as much as humanly possible.
2007-12-28 01:05:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Amy 3
·
8⤊
0⤋