Three days IS a short time; but three days ARE needed to finish the job.
2007-12-28 00:33:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by ghouly05 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because '3 days ', '5 miles' '50 pence' are all total amounts. You don't have 3 seperate days, you have one length of time that is 3 days long, or one distance that is 5 miles etc. If you had '3 cats' you would have 3 seperate cats, not one cat as big as 3 cats. Does that explain it?
2007-12-28 02:36:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by florayg 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
When it's a segment of time, it's considered singular, like:
Two weeks was too short for a trip to Europe.
But, you could say:
Three days are my favorites: my birthday, Christmas, and New Years Day.
Those are 3 separate days, not a segment of time.
2007-12-28 00:40:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by topink 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
IS....
Are....would indicate that EACH of the individual days is short, and in this context would be grammatically incorrect because short would be a designation of size and three "days" can be no shorter than any other days....
A "day" is a standard measure of time....
2007-12-28 00:33:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on the rest of the sentence. If you say "...three days are short," you're meaning that the days themselves are short (such as a short period of daytime in the winter months). If you say "Three days is a short period of time," you're talking about the three days COLLECTIVELY, and that means it's singular.
2007-12-28 00:40:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dances with Unicorns 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Three days "are" short~
2007-12-28 00:29:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by s7evens 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
is
Try it in a differnet sentence, Three days is a long time.
2007-12-28 00:34:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by suspendedagain300 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
is
2007-12-28 00:29:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by cwgrrl7 7
·
1⤊
0⤋