Would they win 72 games like da Bulls lol?
2007-12-28 00:25:52 · 13 answers · asked by lightdion 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Nope....might even be worse. Nash is a PG that likes to control the offense. The Celtics person that controls the offense is Pierce. Pierce isn't a true PG but most everything starts with him. He either will run a play with KG to go inside, get it to Allen coming off a screen, or he will take his mid range jumper that he is so good at.
Rondo does what the Celtics need him to do, play smart offense and tight defense on the other PG.
Nash would want the ball more, frustrating Pierce, and Nash can't play the defense that Rondo can on the quicker PGs in the NBA.
2007-12-28 00:40:25 · answer #1 · answered by David S 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They would win 72 games without Nash. But Nash would come into his own in the playoffs. He could take allot of the leadership duties out of Garnetts hands and give them a 4 scoring option. It would be a team for the ages.
Right now Rondo cant hit shots consistently. Nash can and will.
David S - The celtics offence does not go through pierce. It goes through Garnett. Pierce has a habit of shooting too much and handling too much to be a facilitatior on offence.
2007-12-28 10:02:07 · answer #2 · answered by David J 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Celtics don't need Nash to win it all this year. With Nash on the Celtics the entire offensive game plan would have to change and those changes would not necessarily benefit Garnett, Pierce, or Allen. I believe Nash is a great player when the offense is designed around him but the Celtics current style of play could very likely take them to the promiss land.
2007-12-28 09:00:54 · answer #3 · answered by Frizzer 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
OMG that would be great! I think they would make a record of 80-2 if everyone stayed healthy. While we are getting rid of rondo for nash we should get rid of Paul Pierce for LeBron James!....That team would be totally unstopable. and have a perfect record with winning oer 25 points per game!! and a championship.
2007-12-28 09:00:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They don't need Nash to win 72 games, they will most likely succeed in doing so without him.
2007-12-28 08:59:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Definitely! That would make the life of Garnett and Allen easier on offense. Who needs Pierce when Nash is there?
2007-12-28 08:51:27 · answer #6 · answered by Cold Contagious 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What if LeBron James and Dwight Howard played for the Pistons?? Would they be 82-0? lol
2007-12-28 12:31:41 · answer #7 · answered by pistons_one 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well,we know that the Celtics wouldn't be any worse than they are now. That's for sure.
2007-12-28 09:08:08 · answer #8 · answered by bigjd_rockin 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
75-7, Auto- Championship the leauge should just forfit
2007-12-28 11:05:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Then the celtics woul lose 72 games.he sucks.the 2005 mvp trophy belongs to shaq,nash aint better than kidd,paul,williams or even tinsley.and he looks like.................i mean look at him!!!
2007-12-28 14:57:16 · answer #10 · answered by SHAQ 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋