If they had their way, there would be no guns, so the tiger would have never been shot. Then more people would have been injured or killed, and our tax money would have to pay their medical bills because of the Democrat's social heath care plans.
2007-12-28 00:25:31 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I agree with ya... but not only would the tiger not have been shot, it would have been given an animal shrink to help it deal with it issues
2007-12-28 00:35:48 · answer #1 · answered by tinyfl27 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Can you give a single example where any Democrat sought to remove guns from the police? Or do you think that it was just some armed citizen who shot the tiger? All Democrats want to do is make sure that only people who should own guns actually own them, and that only guns that should be owned are actually owned.
2007-12-28 09:18:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Dems aren't trying to take the guns away from cops, only citizens.
2007-12-28 08:42:44 · answer #3 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
well since the republicans are in office a lot of things are going wrong.if the democrats were in power this attack never would of happened.how;s that for your answer.you must be a republican there;s still time to change over.
2007-12-28 08:34:16 · answer #4 · answered by bigjon5555 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
All Americans are supposed to own firearms. 'Not just the ones 'some' think are supposed to.
2007-12-28 09:29:17 · answer #5 · answered by Destrier 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Dems ARE in charge-----of congress. We see how thats working out.
2007-12-28 08:36:38 · answer #6 · answered by shazaamazam 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋