English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Get rich quick schemes in the capitalist business world, (buyouts, IPOs, conglomerates, acquisitions, mergers, and the stock market), do not actually work. Remaining solvent does not actually exist within false economics capitalism.

Profit existing in the capitalist business world, or millionaires existing within capitalism, is pathological deception committed by the 21 organizations spying on the population with plain clothes agents, (with covert fake names and fake backgrounds).

Actual economics is the persons paying the monthly business loan payments of companies voting at work in order to control the property they are paying for.

Capitalism is the psychology of imaginary parents, false economics, and the criminal deception of employees that are paying the bills (including the stocks and bonds, or shares) of companies.

Anti-Democracy republicanism is the psychology of imaginary parents, and false government.

2007-12-29 03:04:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Communism as it is currently practiced doesn't work.

I'd wager it could work on a small scale or if/when technology was feasible enough to allow all the people in a society free and open access to information, and adhere to democratic principles.

Ideologically, communism is an economic system. It eliminate private property, and forces everyone to share everything.

Because human nature can be downright petty and selfish, such a system of communism is doomed to failure or doomed to tyranny.

However, it could work if a democratic system of government were put in place. I would say that such a system wouldn't last long though.

It'd make for an interesting model to test in a computer game.

2007-12-28 08:19:22 · answer #2 · answered by dgrhm 5 · 0 0

Communism is a theory that can't be realized because people are simply not so selfless and don't care to share with
EVERYBODY. Governments that tried to achieve it had to use force to maintain conformity, those with creativity or money leave, and people lose their drive to do anything. Ultimately it was just another oligarchy, with the connected few living well and everyone else in relative poverty.

2007-12-28 08:21:21 · answer #3 · answered by topink 6 · 0 0

Communism has a major weaknesses. It destroys the human spirit and the economy. In order for communism to work you need a central government with Total CONTROL. No independent thinking allowed, and certainly you are welcome to work harder, but you will be rewarded just as the lazy bum next to you who sleeps all day if they can.

2007-12-28 08:13:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why does the Communist Party believe it is so important that Democrats win?

"Whereas a few weeks ago only a handful of House and Senate seats were considered 'competitive,' now more than 50 House seats are in play and more than a dozen Senate seats," the statement continues. "A change of 15 seats in the House and 6 seats in the Senate would change control of Congress. Members of the congressional Progressive, Black, Hispanic and Asian-Pacific caucuses would chair half of the House committees and sub-committees."

The party urges members to get involved in the election at every level – including the following ways:


"Volunteer to phone bank with your union, neighborhood association or political organization."

"Go door to door in your neighborhood or in citywide mobilizations on behalf of candidates you support."

"Know and discuss with voters the basic issues. Explain why changing Congress is so crucial to reversing the extremist, right-wing thrust of the Republicans."

"Volunteer to be a poll watcher or election judge on Election Day."

"'Protect the vote.' Volunteer with groups working to prevent the right wing's 'voter suppression' and 'vote theft' tactics. Know the election laws and be an advocate for people whose right to vote is under attack."

"Register your family, neighbors and co-workers to vote and bring them to the polls on Nov. 7."

"Help give reminders and rides to get out the vote on Election Day."
The major emphasis of the Communist Party campaign for Democrats is the war in Iraq – and support for the plan by Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., for early withdrawal.

"The pressure for troop withdrawal is growing, so much so that earlier this summer Democrats introduced two resolutions in the Senate," explained a story in the party's People's Weekly World newspaper. "One, authored by Senator Kerry, envisions a short exit strategy and a role for the international community. The other, which has the support of nearly 40 Democratic senators and may be re-introduced this fall, calls for troop withdrawal beginning this winter, but the flaw is that it leaves the process open-ended, which is precisely what Bush does."

The party believes the Democrats will withdraw early from Iraq if they take power in tomorrow's election.

"The media spin has been that the Democrats are split on the war. The real story is that 85 percent of the Democrats in Congress voted for withdrawal and are in step with the majority public opinion," explained another article on the party's website. "Eight months ago, two Democratic senators were for withdrawal; two months ago it was four. This past week 39 Democrats in the Senate voted for withdrawal and the need for non-military support for the reconstruction of Iraq."

Just so there could be no mistake about the party's intentions to support a Democratic Party victory, Judith LeBlanc, national vice-chairwoman of the CPUSA, added: "The Democratic Party and its candidates are only as strong politically and economically as the mass movements behind them. The greater participation of the Party and Left, the more effective the movements are, the more likely we can deliver a blow to the Right in November."

The Democratic Party has refused to respond to WND's story last week that quoted a variety of Middle East terrorist leaders urging American to vote Democratic.

The terrorists told WorldNetDaily an electoral win for the Democrats would prove to them Americans are "tired." They rejected statements from some prominent Democrats in the U.S. that a withdrawal from Iraq would end the insurgency, explaining an evacuation would prove resistance works and would compel jihadists to continue fighting until America is destroyed.

2007-12-30 01:44:20 · answer #5 · answered by Johnny Reb 5 · 0 0

Communism makes everybody do as little as they need to to get by. Why would you work hard and produce a good product if you are not going to be rewarded for it? You wouldn't, that's why communism is evil.

2007-12-28 08:33:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes.
The brightest and most productive citizens will flee and the Communist government would have to build a wall to keep them in.
Shooting the citizens while they are climbing the wall trying to escape is the result. Sometimes the citizens will try to escape in boats or by swimming for freedom.

2007-12-28 08:22:07 · answer #7 · answered by barry_smith_12357 2 · 1 0

Any system that will be accepted by the people only when it is imposed by coercion has many things wrong with it. If you think you would like living your life in a coercive state, then go for it.

One of the jokes I recall hearing from citizens of the USSR, when it existed, went something like this: We pretend to work, and the government pretends to pay us.

2007-12-28 08:13:19 · answer #8 · answered by Cogito Ergo Sum 5 · 0 1

Of course Communism has weaknesses. So does Capitalism. It's called human diversity/individualism. We all have an innate desire to do, have, be, get, want, act, use and love what we please. If we didn't, would prisons be so overcrowded?

2007-12-28 08:16:31 · answer #9 · answered by Little Lulu 4 · 0 0

from each according to his ability-to each according to his need. the problem is that SOMEONE ELSE has to decide what your "ability" is, and what your "needs" are. typically those in power decide, and decide that others have greater ability to give what they can than they really do, and need less than they actually do. of course, those in power think they need more than anyone else. the flaw is that no matter who decides, a human will decide and greed creeps in.

2007-12-28 08:13:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0