English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Including houses and cars. I think people would be fighting over useless things and it would cause a lot of injuries to innocent people. This is why money is actually a good source that we have in this enviroment.

2007-12-26 17:46:06 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

6 answers

hi Vince!! it would be CRAZZZYYY!!!!!!!!! not good...lol

2007-12-27 04:27:08 · answer #1 · answered by ninnaluv 3 · 0 0

I agree with you. Without using money or having to barter in order to get something, people would not have to earn anything in order to satisfy their needs and wants. That would result in the world becoming lazy, ignorant, and apathetic. The idleness would make people bored, and when people are bored, they can be extremely destructive.

2007-12-26 17:56:29 · answer #2 · answered by Aubri M 4 · 0 0

It would be SO boring, you'd WANT to start an argument to liven things up!!!!

Good Morning!

Elysabeth

2007-12-27 03:45:12 · answer #3 · answered by Elysabeth 7 · 1 0

there would be nothing. no one would make anything for the simple fact hey had to dire need to for winacial purposes and that no one else would reaslly need it since someone else gave ti to them for free

2007-12-26 17:51:19 · answer #4 · answered by Butterfly 3 · 0 0

the strong would have and the weak would not - there's always some kind of currency and brute force would be wealth

2007-12-26 17:55:01 · answer #5 · answered by Norman 7 · 0 0

nobody would have cared to produce things and we all would have died

2007-12-26 17:51:24 · answer #6 · answered by Chocogal 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers