Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. I mean,Sherlock Holmes is a legend Everyone knows who he is.
2008-01-02 07:51:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by glad to help :) 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle! His books are more interesting! Sherlock Holmes! Although Bram Stoker's books are nice too.
2007-12-27 01:13:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by crane 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Always like going back to Baker Street.
2008-01-03 05:33:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ladyhawke 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably Doyle. I actually find Dracula more bloodcurdling and hence more interesting than most of Doyle's work but Stoker seems to have been pretty much a one-hit wonder.
2007-12-28 00:55:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Maddog 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Doyle transgresses time and number of times read whereas Stoker cloys the appetite after the first reading. I really love Sherlock Holmes.
2007-12-27 08:02:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Conan Doyle. I think he was a bit more consistent than Stoker, and certainly left behind more quality stories.
2007-12-27 00:18:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Roger 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
Arthur Conan Doyle, I guess. not only is does his name include the word 'Conan' but i've never read Bram Stoker.
2007-12-26 23:46:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by KJC 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Difficult to decide since they were equally imaginative but, I would say Doyle because of the suspense before delving into the mystery.
2007-12-27 19:18:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Emissary 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Being a Sherlock Holmes fan, I gotta pick Doyle!
2007-12-26 23:53:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by another_guy_named_steve 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bram Stoker, I've always had a weak spot for horror
2007-12-26 23:46:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋