2007-12-26 14:33:02 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
post of the day..... thanks and that will resolve it.
but no ba$$ will not do what you ask.
2007-12-26 16:18:07 · answer #1 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think he is guilty of taking steroids but lie detector tests prove nothing. Lie detector test results aren't admissable in most states because they are completely unreliable.
2007-12-26 23:39:17 · answer #2 · answered by The Official Texting Pro 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lie detector tests have proven to be fallible.
2007-12-26 22:40:41 · answer #3 · answered by DSC 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Lie Detecting test is not a soul test.
2007-12-26 23:50:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
This whole argument is just a joke - Roger will never have to prove his innocence he can just claim that he never did it and who will challenge him? And on the flip side the Mitchell Report said he did but who can argue with that?
2007-12-26 22:57:27 · answer #5 · answered by Shadow Knight 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
How about you read the news...he is doing just what he needs to do..he is investigating the sources of the allegations
2007-12-26 23:04:18 · answer #6 · answered by Danny B 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The truth will come out in due time.
2007-12-27 08:34:34 · answer #7 · answered by Frizzer 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
y dont u take a lie dectector test?
2007-12-26 22:40:08 · answer #8 · answered by carrie 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
would not help, those tests are full proof.
2007-12-26 23:13:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
why should he? in America we shouldn't have to ~PROVE~ our innocence. Its all hearsay.
2007-12-26 23:26:19 · answer #10 · answered by robert r 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You make him!
2007-12-27 00:01:35 · answer #11 · answered by Harry C 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋