The Conservative Caucus
TEN REASONS TO OPPOSE INITIATION OF WAR ON IRAQ
http://www.conservativeusa.org/iraq-war.htm
The link ABOVE are the reasons they gave while accusing Bill Clinton of "Wag The Dog" tactics (below).
Wag the Dog?
Bill Clinton's U.S. Policy on Iraq
http://www.conservativeusa.org/wagdog.htm
2007-12-26
13:15:57
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Chi Guy
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
-
The Conservative Caucus
"Can anyone honestly say that the $5.5 billion we've invested in our Iraq policy over the last six years has proved worthwhile? Are we not exactly where we started six years ago?"
-
2007-12-26
13:26:04 ·
update #1
-
Where are the NEO-CONS on this? Their silence speaks volumes.
-
2007-12-26
13:49:25 ·
update #2
Nice post and the inference makes a great point.
Distill the politics from going into Iraq and the reality is that Bush lied and our soldiers died...along with many innocent civilians...in a war in Iraq that never needed to be fought.
Thank you for this post.
2007-12-26 13:21:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Thomas B 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
there is not any sturdy reason different than company subsidized conquering of the midsection East. i individually do unlike Obama nor did I look after Bush being the President of my usa, i'm no longer on my own on the two account, in reality greater or less greater advantageous than one million/2 of the U.S. inhabitants consents with me. So could desire to Switzerland come to shop me and my fellow countrymen from this oppression by skill of invading and overthrowing the U.S. government? The argument for invading Iraq demands blithering idiocy and willful submission to an schedule that may not income any American different than those on the perfect of the corporate shape of the two a militia protection contractor, weapons producer or oil correct corporation. yet enable me additionally say that if the U.S. could have opted to 'unencumber' the Sudanese human beings interior the comparable way using fact the Iraqi human beings, there could be drastically greater deaths than there are actually in Sudan, so count variety your advantages.
2016-10-02 09:42:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ordinarily, I would have ignored this, because technically it isn't a question, but your research is fascinating. Thank you.
And yes, I would have agreed with some of the points in the initial memo, which is partly why I *still* do not consider Iraq a "war," but rather an exercise in manipulation and deceit.
2007-12-26 13:26:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No, I don't agree with the conservative caucus. Their 10 reasons not to invade looks like children wrote it. FYI: prior to the current war, I was completely against it, and ironically my predictions about how it turned out were mostly correct.
2007-12-27 01:41:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pfo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmmm yep... Pavlovian party politics playing America like a fiddle.
2007-12-26 13:49:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Amazing that it was written 3 years before W took Office, and almost 4 before 9/11...Should have stuck to their guns, eh?
2007-12-26 13:21:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
YES ESPECIALLY NUMBERS 8 and 9.
HILLARIOUS...
2007-12-26 13:20:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋