Which candidate would be most likely to improve the standard of living for middle class Americans?

Question

... during their term in office?

I define middle class as having an annual household income some where between $50K to $150K

Answer 1

John Edwards or Huckabee.....

Answer 2

Middle class starts a little lower than that but I don't really see any candidate who stands out (yet) who is middle class friendly, none are what we really need right now.

The middle class has been ignored for a while now and we need to bulk it back up and make it strong again, a nation can not stand without a strong middle class.

Answer 3

No applicants are offering that. it may fee too plenty. The democrats won't be able to get the republicans to spend on the constrained infrastructure application they placed forward--so there won't be a activity creation social gathering. The democrat's proposals could help somewhat yet no longer plenty, and the republicans could harm that distinctive concern somewhat yet no longer plenty. i do no longer see any social gathering watching the venture with a plan which will artwork rapidly--i think of the two are hoping that the financial gadget will in simple terms restoration itself. on account that maximum of our production jobs have long gone foreign places, we the two would desire to re-gadget u.s. to make different styles of jobs, or re-gadget our commerce agreements to get them lower back over here. As of yet, I even have heard no candidate placed forward a plan that addresses worker shortages in the fields of the destiny, does something with surplus workers claiming unemployment, or does something to make it so as that extra jobs start up beginning up in this country.

Answer 4

I think your range is a little high but to answer your question I don't think any of them have any idea how to improve the standard of living for any one. If they could improve the standard of living for the middle class it would help to bring up the standard of living for the poor.

Answer 5

None of them, in my opinion. We are the taxpayers. The cash cows. The only thing to benefit us would be a tax cut or more things that are tax deductible that would somehow also help the economy. I think we should be able to deduct all of our health insurance premiums, even make them be pretax credits, more deductions for child care, private school and tuition. Elimination of taxes like whats-his-face is talking about is not realistic.

Answer 6

So far, I dont think any of them stick out. No one has given a real answer to the biggest problem facing the middle and working class... HEALTH CARE COSTS. I have heard several different suggestions from the Democrats, and I don't really like any of them. And, to tell you the truth, all I hear the Republicans talking about is Terrorism and illegal immigration. Those are VERY LEGITIMATE topics, but at the end of the day, HEALTH CARE kicks my *** more than Paco and Pablo doing roofing down the block or Al-qaeada.

Answer 7

Yeah, because we really need more educated but uncreative minivan driving, North Face jacket wearing, 2.5 children soccer mom and dad robots out there. And we should validate thier conformity just because they have a college degree.
The candidate I vote for should focus more on bringing hard working people out of poverty than tax breaks for the middle and upper class.

Answer 8

I don't know, but according to the Libs, part of the income range of your definition is rich. But for that entire range I would expect Obama would do the most damage, followed by Hillary.

Answer 9

why middle class americans?
what about the rest of your country or are you only concerned with yourself ?
there are people in your country that are going through real hardship and yet you can think only of yourself. i would love to be in your position but i know for a fact i would never ask that question.think about the people around you, and consider yourself lucky that you even have an income.bye.

Answer 10

yeah according to obama, 70+ = upper class....weird