bonus question: Did mayor Gavin Newsome presume the tiger, who had attacked a zoo worker last year, was rehabilitated and allowed it out on a furlough?
2007-12-26 12:17:30 · 18 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-12/27/content_7319266.htm
2007-12-26 12:18:24 · update #1
For those who dislike the question, I'd rather you pass on it, or answer it, rather than assume I loathe liberals.
2007-12-26 14:12:27 · update #2
Actually, it was withdrawing troops from Serbia that got the liberals in trouble. And just like the GOP predicted, they followed us home and now we have to fight them here, instead of there.
2007-12-26 12:25:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 7⤋
bonus question: Did mayor Gavin Newsome presume you were mentally competent and let you out on furlough?
2007-12-26 21:02:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think it is the conservative policies that so many zoos think it cost too much money to put these big cats into large secure areas with room to roam, and instead put them into small cages where they literally go insane. I won't go to zoos because this drives me crazy. The last time I did go, with my child's school group, the thing I saw besides the pacing lion with the crazy eyes, staring past the people who were ignoring the "do not bang on the glass" sign, was a fat little boy, about 8 or 9 years old, with an ice cream in one hand and a candy bar in the other. He was looking at the exhibit of wart hogs and shouting "YAH! YAH! You big, fat pigs!" over and over. I really believe we live in strange times.
As far as bonuses go, they should have given it something else to hunt and kill so it didn't go crazy..... I won't say what
2007-12-26 20:36:54 · answer #3 · answered by sas 3 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Thank you for clearly showing that every event, no matter how tragic, is for you nothing more than another opportunity to show your undying hatred of anyone who disagrees with you politically. Such a shining example of conservative values.
2007-12-26 21:25:19 · answer #4 · answered by au_catboy 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You are using the deaths of innocent by standards as well as the animal nature of a tiger to try to make a political partisan point...
Really, how do you sleep at night?
2007-12-26 20:31:18 · answer #5 · answered by jerome2all 6 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Actually I heard the Tiger was gay and was trying to get to Mayor Newsome to join her and the gay Puma in holy matrimony.
2007-12-26 21:58:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
You are stooping as low as the libs. I thought only they would try to turn something so none politacal into a politcal issue.
2007-12-26 21:01:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
It's the zoo's job to take care of tigers, not the rest of the city or mayor. Politics have nothing to do with it, other than the weak image of trying to bash liberals.
2007-12-26 20:24:43 · answer #8 · answered by Mitchell 5 · 7⤊ 5⤋
its a critically endangered species - it will not be put down for scratching a zoo keeper
2007-12-26 20:22:51 · answer #9 · answered by PD 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
this is either a poor attempt at humor or you are one of the most uninformed people on the planet. Either way, it is pretty much pathetic.
2007-12-26 20:30:03 · answer #10 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 9⤊ 3⤋