2007-12-26 10:48:44 · 15 answers · asked by $1,539,684,631,121 Clinton Debt 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Contrary to the above answer, one need not be a lawyer to be a Supreme Court justice (although historically there has never been a non-lawyer on the bench).
And even if he were nominated (by her), he'd have to go through the confirmation process; I doubt that he'd be confirmed.
He could provide much better assistance in other jobs.
2007-12-26 10:58:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
First of all Bill would never get confirmed, having been censured and disbarred.
I had never considered Hillary for the court. I think she would actually make a great Supreme Court justice. While I revile her politics, it is important for the court to have balance.
She could replace Justices Ginsberg or Stevens.
2007-12-26 21:53:51 · answer #2 · answered by wcowell2000 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More likely Hillary will be nominated for the Court when President Obama makes his first pick. :)
P.S. You don't have to be an attorney to be on the Supreme Court.
2007-12-26 18:51:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, the pervert would be chained up like a puppy if his wife makes it as president. For one thing, I really don't think Hilary shouldn't be running for president at all, she should put a chain on her perverted husband right now and keep an eye on him, would you not agree?
2007-12-26 20:23:26 · answer #4 · answered by FILO 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Two problems:
1. He was disbarred.
2. There might not be any openings - a justice has to retire or die.
2007-12-26 21:22:40 · answer #5 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, Bill will not be nominated to any posts that require Congressional confirmation.
2007-12-26 19:31:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Someone already there has to retire or die. Besides that I doubt that would be accepted by Congress or the public.
2007-12-26 20:11:53 · answer #7 · answered by PrivacyNowPlease! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God help us if she's elected even more so if he's on the Supreme Court
2007-12-26 18:59:04 · answer #8 · answered by Den_Rode_Bjornen_Losener 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is certainly within the realm of possibility. Look, he can't possibly be more partisan or intellectually dishonest than Scalia, Thomas or Alito.
2007-12-26 19:01:05 · answer #9 · answered by TK 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No...president of the UN
2007-12-26 18:53:22 · answer #10 · answered by netjr 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋