2007-12-26 10:06:05 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Not in this lifetime.
2007-12-26 10:09:00 · answer #1 · answered by marlene50 3 · 11⤊ 4⤋
Bush has surpassed an govt order--no longer a regulation, in basic terms an govt order--that provides him the appropriate to droop elections contained in terms of 'emergency' and likewise provides him the appropriate to return to a decision what constitutes an 'emergency'. often, a president keeping an emergency and postponing an election would not be criminal, whether there became an govt order to try this. yet Bush has carried out unconstitutional issues formerly and no one's stopped him. while this happens it turns right into a precedent for destiny presidents. the super irony right this is that Hillary Clinton ought to grow to be the main useful president the U. S. has ever had, merely by utilising utilising the precedents set for her by utilising Bush. the complication is that his human beings ought to -create- an emergency, like a nuclear conflict or some thing like that, giving Bush the justification he desires to return to a decision we don't desire a clean president as we communicate. i assume it rather is available. i'm specific Bush's coverage human beings have seen it. yet i do no longer think of he will attempt something like that. i do no longer think of he ought to ruin out with it! Time will tell, nonetheless. stay tuned, it rather is going to be an exciting 3 hundred and sixty 5 days!
2016-12-18 08:54:02 · answer #2 · answered by hokenson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Two more years of Bush? Who are you shilling for? Al Queda or the Red Chinese? Because he's given both of them more than they could have ever hoped for.
We could use a President who puts America's Interests ahead of those of foreigners. Even Big Business has grown uncomfortable with the rate at which Bushonomics and the War in Iraq are destroying the Economy and strengthening our enemies.
It'll be a great day for America when the 82nd Airborne drags him out of the Oval Office that he'll refuse to give up in 2009.
2007-12-26 10:33:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If Bush were in for 2 more years this country would not survive.
2007-12-26 10:23:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
The president and everyone in congress can hit the road as far as I'm concerned. Get em all out of there.
2007-12-26 10:54:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You described one of my worst fears. This administration is so corrupt that it wouldn't suprise me if he found some way to make this a reality.. If this seriously happend I think we will overthrow this government, this is why I am voting for Ron Paul!
So go ahead and thumbs down.. see if i care!
2007-12-26 10:30:36 · answer #6 · answered by noituloeve maerd 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Like we need him doing any more damage that the Republicians have already done.....no we need a Democrat and we need Hilary who already knows how 2 do the job.
2007-12-26 12:44:23 · answer #7 · answered by Don't Cha 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are you kidding? 3 minutes into his first term I was pricing homes in Europe.
2007-12-26 11:10:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Thank God for the 22nd amendment!
It's not just Bush. Really, I don't want any president around for more than two terms.
2007-12-26 10:11:27 · answer #9 · answered by Somebody else 6 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Yeah why not? It's getting harder and harder to find the right kind of bozo these days.
2007-12-26 10:31:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Better than the hildabeast.
Let's elect hillary and let another clinton make a joke out of the whitehouse.
2007-12-26 10:16:08 · answer #11 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 6⤊ 3⤋