http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22338499/
Does Freedom of Speech as defined clearly in the Constitution still exist?
2007-12-26 08:55:11 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Two words....
She resisted.
2007-12-26 10:28:54 · answer #1 · answered by California Street Cop 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
With freedom of speech comes accountability. Her freedom of speech additionally allowed her to settle for the consequences of her speech. The officer develop into stated as in through cashier questioning this woman develop into employing a stolen credit card. Had the lady complied and reported the priority in a rational way, issues could have labored out in yet in a distinctive way. This man or woman is for sure from the shallow end of the gene pool. you do no longer argue and curse an armed police officer. i do no longer care in case you're ideal or no longer. All that officer knew develop into that somebody develop into appearing irrationally. this is between the flaws this is erroneous in this country right this moment, an entire loss of comprehend for authority. there's a gadget for addressing problems in case you're ideal and the policeman is erroneous. it is stated as courtroom. this is the place the venture ought to be addressed, no longer by employing arguing and cursing the cop. She's fortunate the cop had a taser and did no longer use a nighttime stick or black jack to subdue her. somewhat comprehend could have long gone an prolonged way in fixing the venture.
2016-11-25 02:13:03 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is some stupid chick! Being on the cell phone and walking away from her credit card lying on the cashiers counter shows how brainless she is.
The fact that she was not able to hold a civil conversation with an officer goes to prove that she is probably also a moron.
The correct thing that she should have done, would be to apologize to the cashier for her phone rudeness and give the officer respect for doing his job.
I would have also given the officer my best soft eye look.
I can also do alligator eyes.
2007-12-26 11:24:16 · answer #3 · answered by Stars and Stripes 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is all a by product of Bush's forsaking our committment to the Geneva conventions.
The only thing that ever trickled down from Republicans has been brutality and disdain for freedom
2007-12-26 09:12:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Where do you get without cause out of your story?
The cause may or may not have been sufficient to warrant a taser and im sure there will be a thorough hearing regarding it, but there surely was one.
making up stuff i see eh.
2007-12-26 09:08:26 · answer #5 · answered by sociald 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your link does not prove your premise.
If a person wishes to respond to a police officer investigating a valid complaint with the F bomb, shouting, yelling, and arm waving, and then fails to obey the lawful instructions of the police officer, they have put themselves at risk of a forcible arrest.
Stupid is as stupid does.
2007-12-26 09:04:00 · answer #6 · answered by raichasays 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
it sounded to me like the cop did the right thing.
when a cop gives an order, it's best to comply. (without hostilities) seems the best buy patron was a bit shady.no, a lot shady. seems the cop was just doing her job.
2007-12-26 09:05:12 · answer #7 · answered by daddio 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
so your saying its OK to resist police and disturb the public...i am glad that person got tased for refusing to obey authority...the person did have due process and cause...so your question is misleading...
2007-12-26 09:08:07 · answer #8 · answered by turntable 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
a few steps away from socialism just wait till it gets to the point where they can shoot a .40 S&W into someone without cause or process of law and arrest them just for shouting at them.
2007-12-26 09:02:51 · answer #9 · answered by dmxx9900 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
This has been going on a lot and it will continue to happen until we put a stop to it.
2007-12-26 10:16:57 · answer #10 · answered by Not To Serious 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋