2007-12-26 06:41:00 · 8 answers · asked by llgii i 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
no
2007-12-26 06:45:09 · answer #1 · answered by Mr DEDEDE aka The Gawd 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Just because both are rich doesn't mean one's a ripoff of the other. DiBiase bought everything as the main part of his gimmick, JBL doesn't.
2007-12-26 15:01:59 · answer #2 · answered by Mikey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No...they have nothing big in common besides the "money" fact..
Ted Dibiase was the type of guy that everything he wanted..used to buy it..He was paying IRS for his services..like you saw on the RAW Anniversary weeks ago..
J.B.L was completely different and his gimmick wan't that long reigning..since he was known as Bradsaw on A.P.A
J.B.L is good but Ted Dibiase made a successfull and entertaining gimmick out of nowhere..the same goes to IRS..
2007-12-26 14:52:37 · answer #3 · answered by Koumidiator WRW VLR OS 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a little but ted dibiase was the best
2007-12-26 15:45:02 · answer #4 · answered by ECW Orginal 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all, JBL is way more annoying!
2007-12-26 14:46:31 · answer #5 · answered by EDGE IS THE TRUE CHAMP!!!!!!!!!! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never!!....Ted had way more style.
2007-12-26 14:49:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. There are similarieties, but there not extacly alike.
2007-12-26 14:44:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
nah
2007-12-26 14:45:13 · answer #8 · answered by sG4RYt 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋