http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/26/us/politics/26clinton.html?ei=5065&en=8b39bde5fe6b23a1&ex=1199336400&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
2007-12-26 05:59:44 · 17 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Strength and experience huh? Strength maybe, if you count the strength of her will and determination to become the President through any means and by saying anything that is politically expedient at the moment, Experience? None really. She failed miserably at Hillary Care, which was the one thing Bill gave her to do on her own. Until she and Bill release the records in the Presidential archieves insteading of hiding them like the Rose Law Firm documents, she can shut up about experience.
2007-12-26 06:09:09 · answer #1 · answered by booman17 7 · 7⤊ 3⤋
I am aware of her political competency (a political science graduate from Wesley and a Yale Law graduate.) She is qualified to be a politician, as seen by her aiding her Husband's political movements. Qualified to be president, though, after one term as Senator of a State where she never lived? No no no. One interesting key note of her political savvy; little known fact there Norm, she was crucial to the research of impeachment laws that forced President Nixon's resignation, so she was the best person for Bill to have in his corner when his trouble in office came around. She is a strategist, but not a president. Let's let not vote a lawyer or a politician into office, what we need is a leader. Vote your conscious, but everyone please VOTE!
2007-12-27 07:33:26 · answer #2 · answered by Derek M 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being a sounding board to the Pres is hardly an experience at all. If she's so experienced why doesn't she release the papers documenting her involvement in decision making?
What she's not revealing is that she doesn't need experience since Bill will be "helping" her out to make up her mind. In essence we'll have a the Third Bill administration.
2007-12-26 14:09:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Don't need to go to no link for this one. Better question, WHAT has Hillary done that qualifies her to hold that office? Of course, the office is still stained from her husband (the blue dress is gone but I hear the carpets are the same) so it doesnt hold the prestige it once did.
Every candidate screams we need a change in the office, but they represent the same stagnant do nothing status quo objects we now have. To get change, both houses of congress and the white house ust be cleaned out entirely.
2007-12-26 14:15:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
No! Oh, No. It is a pity that this great country ran out of strong, reliable men to the point where we have to put it in the hands of a corrupt, self-centered woman.
2007-12-26 14:10:45 · answer #5 · answered by dori 2 · 7⤊ 1⤋
The only people who believe Hillary Clinton has the experience to be President are people who want to believe it.
Happy New Year!
.
2007-12-26 14:08:02 · answer #6 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 9⤊ 2⤋
Of course not. Being a First Lady and an ineffective, carpetbagger Senator do not qualify her.
2007-12-26 14:09:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
I think she is qualified. But does that mean that I think she is the best candidate??? NO.
2007-12-26 17:10:36 · answer #8 · answered by kty_weber 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-12-26 15:54:10 · answer #9 · answered by MrEntrepreneur 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well I would have to say that she's more qualifed to be president than my cat because she speaks English fluently and my cat can't.
2007-12-26 14:39:51 · answer #10 · answered by Jeffrey B 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋