How did you come to the conclusion that government MUST offer a fix to every.....?

Question

small or large problem that comes along?

Where did you get the idea that it is the governments role to come to your aid, hold your hand, give you money and make everything better for you?

I guess I'm trying to pick your mind. Why do you think government, whether it be federal, state or local, should rush to your assistance when things go wrong for you?

Answer 1

That's a great question and I can't wait to read the insane answers you'll get.

The answer is that the government is NOT the answer to all of our problems. We should take care of ourselves! The less government intervention in our lives the better!

*star*

Answer 2

The first problem with your question is that it addressed to a ghost. There is no one that has concluded that the government must fix all things.

The second problem with your question is that it poses the idea that the government is some external thing we must put up with and have no control over. But the government (in a free republic such as the US) is us. We get the government we ask for at the polling place. If people truly did not want the government to solve problems in society (and spend the money it takes to solve problems) they have an opportunity to be heard on the matter at every election. I have not heard any politician (except for maybe Ron Paul) that is promising a government that will do less for you and leave some of the problems currently being addressed through government in your hands.

The third problem with your question is the idea that coming to the aid of people in need simply not the job of government. Justice, Domestic tranquility, promoting the general welfare and providing for the common defense are mandates of the FEDERAL government in the constitution. Aid to the poor, aid to victims of natural disasters, protection from armed conflict, protection from injustice, a well maintained infrastructure, education, standards and safety and many other government activities and programs clearly fall under this mandate.

While the powers if the federal government are limited in the constitution, no where does the constitution prescribe a small government. No where does the constitution prevent or even discourage the people from solving problems through the government they elect. In fact, quite the opposite is true.

Answer 3

The reason that people think that government is there to fix all of the problems is that people are too lazy to do something for themselves. In my opinion, if there is a little problem and government steps in to fix it, the little problem is turned into a larger problem. In the case of the levees in New Orleans, the problem with them was the Corps of Engineers. Specifications should have been written, sent out for bids from private construction companies and the best bid chosen to do the work. If the work did not meet the specifications the company could then be made to rectify it and the cost to the taxpayers would not have been nearly as high and the quality of work would have been much better. Think back over the past 50 years to problems that the government has worked on and tell me just how many problems that they have actually solved. I can't think of one instance that the government has actually solved one thing completely and totally.

Answer 4

The Constitution CLEARLY states to handle this on a state level... It is being changed by Liberal Democrat views that want the federal government to be responsible for every step of everyday of your life and wants to tax you to make that possible. The Constitution needs to be upheld and these other choices need to blow away in the wind along with the global warming theories.. There are MUCH more important issues then whether or not Johnny and his 12 sisters gets free child care at the tax payers expense, so the mother can go work at a convience store making minimum wage and screaming that she is being under paid and over worked for less pay then someone who has a 4 year degree and management expierence.

Jehen?? what Constitution are YOU reading.. It CLEARLY states that the reason of the Constitution is to LIMIT the POWER of the Federal Government and should be handled on a state level. How you got your interpretation I don't know but it is CLEARLY Stated, and can not be interpreted any other way.

Answer 5

While I believe all problems should not be fixed by the Government.But I do think a lot of big problems should be fixed by the government and I came to that conclusion when I got my very first paycheck and was introduced to FICA. I do believe that the amount of money they take in in taxes should be used to help it's citizens. People falling on hard times, natural disasters, education, stuff like that I expect the government to provide. The small problems in the country shouldn't be expected by anyone to be fixed by the government.

Answer 6

Capitalism would not would desire to be fastened, it is not any longer broken. In a loose marketplace, marketplace forces will ideal themselves. there will be winners and losers. Governments efforts to step in and to attempt to guard the losers distorts the markets and provides the effect of failure. look at GM as an occasion. the government rescue is a distortion of the marketplace. If the business enterprise develop into allowed to fail there could have been others to step in and purchase and make investments in the sources and build the vehicles employing a distinctive and probable extra helpful physique of suggestions. undesirable techniques and operations fail, good ones succeed. the government, by employing rescuing the business enterprise, rewarded a detrimental business enterprise and subsequently has given the business enterprise no actual incentive to alter. in simple terms look at the main present disaster. the government involvement in the housing marketplace created distortions that the marketplace tried to react to. The distortions grew to become so super that the comprehensive marketplace collapsed, no longer through capitalism, yet through government effect.

Answer 7

Not me.
I worked as a Police Officer through earthquakes, floods, a riot, and the Democratic National Convention.

As a civilian, I am sure I can deal with anything, provided I can make my own shelter and hunt my own food. I've got enough survival gear and stored food for me and my neighbors too, if they need it.

I am materially certain I'd do a better job than some FEMA representative, or Red Cross volunteer.

Just keep those damn news crews off my street!

Answer 8

Then what's the point of having a government? to just act as a banker for the military?...why am I paying my taxes?...I'm not saying that the government should or can fix every little problem that comes along, but as long as I'm stuck paying taxes, I would much rather have that money going towards helping other people, education, healthcare, etc. And, yes...I would hope that if I were in need of assistance, my government would come to my aid. After all, we're paying for it.

Answer 9

Large problems, yes.

For instance, if the government built levees in New Orleans can't hold back the ocean, the government gets to clean up its mess.

A better question is: where did so many people get the idea that the sole purpose of the government is to protect them from fear?

Answer 10

I think people depend on and blame the Government way to much. Katrina was one perfect example of this.