Is there a reason why Good American Presidential Candidates are a thing of the past?

Question

Do good Leaders simply refuse to go through the Liberal Back stabbing it takes to become President?

Answer 1

It is now the era of the panderer, not the statesman.

Answer 2

interior the present previous basically 2 presidential elections look to have gained any important impression from vice chairman nominations. In 1960, John F. Kennedy could desire to no longer be elected without the electoral votes of Texas and a variety of of different different southern states. His decision of Lyndon Johnson made a huge difference. This grow to be an awfully close election. In 1992 the assessment between vice chairman Dan Quayle and vice chairman-nominee Al Gore grow to be plenty greater stark than the assessment between George H.W. Bush and bill Clinton. yet another fairly close election, probably desperate by applying the Perot component blended with the vice chairman decision.

Answer 3

It's because who gets to run is controlled from within the parties - and the parties are controlled by the powers behind the scenes (Bilderbergs - not party delegates).

JFK was the last president worthy of the title. His asassination was in effect a coup d'etat that was successfully covered-up.

All candidates since then have been people who are totally under control and eminently blackmailable.

Answer 4

in the on-going quest for total political correctness, every morally bankrupt idea must be given full consideration and those that refuse to accept them are branded in some way. America isn't looking for GOOD leaders, it's looking for leaders that make people feel good. the days of telling people what they need to hear is long gone, it's been replaced with telling people what they want to hear. Quantity goes up, quality goes down.

Answer 5

I'm not sure what it is you mean by "liberal back stabbing".

But as for your question in the title... it really boils down to campaign finance AND lobbying. The corporate elite runs the show, and has for quite a bit of time now.

Answer 6

There's just more money to be made elsewhere. Look at Al Gore, would he give up all the millions he's making for a $400k a year job? Ofcourse not.

I'm not saying he's a good candidate, just using him as an example.

Answer 7

Trust someone like you to radically oversimplify this into Liberal vs. Conservative issue.

The problem has more to do with the office being for sale to the highest bidder, corruption inherent in the system of getting to the White House, lobbying interests, and a lack of conviction regarding anything higher than personal ambition and greed. This cuts across the Liberal/Conservative spectrum.

Answer 8

,I feel if we the people were not so split on our views, Any President would stand a better chance A President of any party, literally puts his life on the line when he decide to run, I think President Kennedy and Reagan proved this point, their predators used guns, we the the people ,use our mouth's such a shame.

Answer 9

That is true, but this system is all we have and continues to be the process though which all of the candidate's must go. So, get over it and vote.

Answer 10

And for this question, that is why they should give it back to the original natives of the land.
those that had/have respect