No, they killed him because he called a spade a spade. These so-called 'jews' that murdered him were actually decendants of Edomites that had adopted Judaism during the Maccabean period. They had been put in power by the Romans in the form of the Herods whom appointed family members to key positions, even within the religion. He even built a temple for them. He also had the geneology records kept at the temple burned, because they proved the edomite bloodline of so many, including himself.
Yahshua called them on it, and gave his life, at least as a catalist, for it.
2007-12-28 04:40:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What a load or rubbish.
The Jews had no desire nor need to kill Jesus. Firstly he was a practising Jew himself and even though he challenged orthodoxy, he was a devout Jew. He was opposed to divorce for example, which was a tougher stance than even the most religious Jews took back then.
For the Jews, Jesus was just one of many young radicals. He was not a problem for them.
And crucially: the Jews were totally oppressed by the Romans, and in no position to either order nor request anyone's death.
The Romans were the only ones to ever practise crucifixion. They wanted rid of Jesus because he was a political agitator in their eyes.
The new testament was written decades after Jesus died, by men who never met him and were not there when he died. It was also written largely for a Roman audience; thus the blame for the crucifixion was shifted firmly away from the Romans - and onto the Jews.
It is a lie that has led to tremendous anti Jewish sentiment and much persecution against Jews down through the centuries.
EDIT TO RIVIVA
- lol lol lol :)
2007-12-26 18:56:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hi,
Did you get these ideas from one of those fantasy writers who write alternate histories from parallel like Kirk Mitchel, Robert Harris et al?
Even if we discount Jesus as being who he says he is, the Romans got into Palestine by
1) initially helping the Jews as technical advisers in the struggle against the Greek Kings.
2) Being invited in as arbitraters to settle a Jewish civil war between the priests and aristocracy.
3) Finally staying on after they decided the Jews couldn't even govern themselves much like the Brits did later.
That said, many Jews like your ruling class and businessmen liked the Pax Romana and were happy to collaborate and prosper whereas there were more radical elements that did not and wanted their independence. The richer status quo like the Pharisees "wanted" continued Roman rule and had Jesus removed, "partly" because they considered him a threat to Pax Romana. This later did not matter because another more militaristic minded leader came along 30 years later, rebelled and threw everything into turmoil.
Mike K
2007-12-26 12:09:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mike K 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Hmmm. Maybe in YOUR alternate timeline but not this one. Read the Bible dude, cause it's the most accurate book for Christianity and Jesus to date.
2007-12-26 12:27:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Daniel S 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Since Paperback has already intelligently responded to this rubbish, I feel free to say only one thing.
You're crazy.
2007-12-26 19:05:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Wow, you are totally high. From where are you getting this garbage? Or are you just making it up?
2007-12-26 13:38:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
i gotta tell you this is the most rediculous, but imaginative rewriting of history i've ever heard, Whetever you've been smokin', stop! stop! its not helping your tenuous grip on reality.
2007-12-26 12:20:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lillian T 3
·
7⤊
0⤋
Ummmm...
Where's the real history here?
2007-12-26 11:56:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Yun 7
·
6⤊
0⤋