If he is so right, why does TWC continue in it's quest of manmade global warming?
2007-12-26 03:18:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
First of all, he isn't associated with TWC any more. Second, he's a weatherman who had a good business idea. His credentials do not really lend themselves to questioning the overwhelming scientific consensus about human contribution to climate change.
2007-12-26 03:33:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think there may be a easing off by the media on the Man made Global warming issue. I have noticed that even when the are doing a story that's promotes belief in it . They now use the phrase "Some scientist say" thereby acknowledging.That not all scientist agree with the scenario being presented as fact
2007-12-26 11:35:00 · answer #2 · answered by Average Joe 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mr. Crawford interviewed numerous scientists involved in Global Warming "research" and found that 76% of them anonymously agreed with him that it is one of the biggest scams in history, but they are not about to cancel their meal ticket. So much for scientific integrity. When there's a lot of money to be made, integrity flies out the window. He has over 50 years experience in the field, so he has the credentials. TWC is a commercial channel and is not about to bury itself in controversy.
2007-12-26 11:48:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Among Coleman's points:
• The campaign to assign a degree of human responsibility for global warming was hatched by "dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives" in the "late 1990s to create an illusion of rapid global warming."
• From there, "friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going." Then, "environmental extremists, notable politicians among them, then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild 'scientific' scenario."
Coleman then went on to try and separate belief from science: "Global warming, i.e. climate change, is not about environmentalism or politics. It is not a religion. It is not something you 'believe in.' It is science; the science of meteorology. This is my field of lifelong expertise."
2007-12-26 11:23:58 · answer #4 · answered by Jason 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Please. Weather and global climate change are NOT the same thing.
I wish people would stop acting like they know what they're talking about...
A meteorologist is not going to be able to tell you anything about global warming. They're two totally different sciences.
2007-12-26 11:34:49 · answer #5 · answered by Amy 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Maybe he believes the science is flawed and he also believes in free speech? Just a thought.
2007-12-26 11:21:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Because he has too much Jeezuz on the brain.
2007-12-26 11:26:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
opinions are like @#^&*^%$ everyone has one
you can fill in the blanks
2007-12-26 11:23:42 · answer #8 · answered by **drew** 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because he's a corporate head and not a scientist?
2007-12-26 11:24:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
Maybe because he hasn't drunk the kool-aid.
2007-12-26 11:22:42 · answer #10 · answered by SithLord 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋