2007-12-25 13:51:54 · 24 answers · asked by Conspicuously Inconspicuous 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
If you travelled into the future 1 year, you would be missing for that year, therefore you could not have died. The real paradoxes come from travelling into the past, since it violates the causality principle. For example, you could travel back 1 year and kill yourself (the "you" that existed one year ago), resulting in no "you" to travel back and kill yourself in the first place.
2007-12-25 13:58:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, i can't quite say i've been exactly where you're at. But I've been close. Im also pregnant, and my baby daddy and I are finally working it out and doing fine. But it took us breaking up and giving each other time away from each other to realize we wanted to be together. Absense makes the heart grow fonder. My Advice? Give it time. Don't contact him constantly and call him all the time, that will only agrivate him futher, and might even make him less likely to talk to you. He broke up with you and right now doesn't seem to want to talk to you, So let him be for now. Thats the best you can do. Give it a week or two, i know it's hard, but sometimes time can only tell. But realize, your are a part of him, no matter where he goes, you are carrying HIS child. He can run away from that but so far. Im sure he'll come around. If he doesn't don't get to worked up, Everything that's mean't to be will be. Just take care of that baby! =] Your got a child on the way girl! Don't worry to much about your boyfriend, because he might come and go, that baby will be by your side through thick and thin for the rest of your life. Just give it time and don't stress hun. Good Luck! :)
2016-05-26 05:52:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Time travel can be a confusing topic to discuss, there are so many possibilities. Chances are it'd be impossible to travel 1 year into the future to find that you'd died six months before because by travelling a year into the future, you'd have skipped that year and therefore wouldn't have been around to have popped your cloggs in the first place.
2007-12-25 14:23:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I assume that if you died 6 months before you were originally going to time-travel, it would have been impossible to travel 1 year into the future. Whatever device that allowed you to travel would only let you go 6 months into the future.
Another version! Supposing you went into the future 1 year and found that you had died. It would be necessary for you to go back to original time so that you could then die. If you simply traveled 1 year into the future and stayed there, then for that 1 year that you skipped, you would have not existed, and therefore wouldn't have been able to die. ---You would need to go into the future, see yourself, return, and THEN die.
2007-12-25 14:07:47 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
See your thinking of time travel like it is in the movies. But real time travel would be very different. You and the only you there is would have to get into a space ship and travel at the speeds around the speed of light and after a year of earth time you go back and see earth, you where gone so there was no you to die. Now if you could go back into time which really is impossible unlike going foward in time (theory) if you tried ti kill someone the theory is you would not be able to if they were not supposed to die than. If you tried to shot a furture president of the US when he was 20 years old with a gun the gun would not fire, or you would miss etc...
2007-12-25 18:46:43 · answer #5 · answered by Steven H 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You would be breaking the causality of things, that is, in everyday life the cause comes first and then the effect. You turn off the radio and the music stops. You don´t see radios whith music stoping first and their owners turning them off later.
If you travel to the future just to learn that you have died, you open a paradox in time.
It is supposed that when you come back you try to avoid the cause of your future death, so you don´t die in 6 months as you learned in your trip but many years later.
But, if your future has changed what would happen when you get there? You wouldn´t find yourself dead, so you wouldn´t come back with the news that originated the change, so how could you have changed your past? You get in a loop, in a paradox of time.
2007-12-25 18:19:46 · answer #6 · answered by Asker 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You might just have travelled but in actuality, you are not physically present (because you died 6 mos. ago). What you got to do is know the facts/reasons of your death at that 6th month. And decide if you'd want to do something that would change that 1yr or 6mo 'future'.
2007-12-25 16:08:57 · answer #7 · answered by Striker 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You cannot travel into a future that you are not in. Therefore if you had died six months ago then the farthest you could travel would be six months, and you would immediately die.
2007-12-25 14:20:10 · answer #8 · answered by North_Star 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's a derviation of the Grandfather Paradox. So, there's 2 possiblilities, Either:
1) You are alive, it breaks no laws of physics, and everybody is happy
or-
2) you die.......
So dont travel into the future too much =)
2007-12-25 13:58:16 · answer #9 · answered by Synthuir 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Whoever inherited your money would be somewhat upset!
According to an article in New Scientist time may be disappearing anyway - an alternative explanation for the apparent acceleration of the exapnsion of the universe
2007-12-25 22:04:30 · answer #10 · answered by Ian M 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋