I think he makes them better when they're good, and worse when they're bad. As long as they keep playing at a high level, he'll be valuable.
2007-12-25 13:30:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by rob 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
T.O while being trashed by everyone for his arrogant attitude was and is one of the top wide receivers in the game,even when not catching one pass in the whole game,he is being double and sometimes triple teamed,that leaves other receivers open for completions,so while not being the receiver with the yardage,he contributed by keeping the defense busy,the Cowboys do have the ability to make adjustments the absence of T.O by using Marion Barber & JJ running and catching the ball
2007-12-25 21:33:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Of course not. And what other teams have 2nd receivers who are as good as T.O.? (Hint: none).
There is an obvious drop off after T.O. on their roster, as theree would be on any roster. Therefore, not having him is a hindrance to their offense.
Probably won't matter, he'll have three weeks to rest and will be back for the Divisional Game in mid January.
2007-12-25 22:05:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mike D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Without T.O. but, with Terry Glenn, I believe that they would be more efficient. T.O., is in on the occasional big play (when He doesn't drop it) but, when He was healthy, Glenn and, Whitten were aquiring the vast majority of first downs. as far as T.O., attracting a lot of attention from the defense, all teams double cover the number one receiver and, as for His big play capability, Crayton has filled that role admirably, as of late. still, it doesn't hurt to have Him on Your team as, You can never have enough good, healthy receivers.
2007-12-25 21:35:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by ny21tb 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
TO has barely been involved in the offense the last couple of weeks and we have still been winning, not counting the whole jessica simpson fiasco against the eagles.
just as a side note, TO will be fine by the time the superbowl comes around. hes a quicker healer, like how he came back from that broken leg in philadelphia.
2007-12-25 21:30:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ron 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's really obvious, Cowboys wouldn't be the same without TO. It's like taking away Moss or Harrison from Brady and Manning. They lose their best weapon.
2007-12-25 21:33:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by JLD 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Of course not, since he is one of the best WRs in the NFL.
2007-12-25 21:24:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bill 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
actually, I think they'd be a better team without the loud mouth (assuming they'd get a decent draft choice for him).
2007-12-25 21:25:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by lmspencr 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Obviously not.
2007-12-25 21:38:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by wannagodaty 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes, less distraction
2007-12-25 21:28:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Merlin F 4
·
0⤊
1⤋