It's only against the law if you make a knowingly false statement of fact, which would then potentially give rise to a cause of action for defamation.
However, the second requirement for defamation is that you be able to prove that you were financially damaged by it.
Richard
2007-12-25 10:42:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by rickinnocal 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
My chum, first i'm a republican, yet maximum severely i'm an American who loves the ideal to vote. And what I truthfully have observed, and in case you rather circulate back and think of approximately it quite is that this: it quite is not the polls! Over the weeks, Romney's group has lost court docket conflict after court docket conflict; Ohio, Florida, VA (alongside with the Goode ruling), Texas, SC, NC, NH, Colorado, some a million,seven-hundred criminal battles have been waged interior the few months, although if it boiled all the way down to perhaps 12+ or so huge ones this previous month or so. in case you circulate back and verify out the information, the polls, and money, it quite is all tied into those judgements. As Romney's lost the ideal to reject Democratic electorate in each and each state, his polls numbers dropped, his spending in that state dropped. at present whilst PA ruling grow to be introduced, Fox company went on television and stated republican coffers, money already gained by applying regular Republican communities will now be going to the senate and congressional races and to no longer Romney. back till now the 40 seven% remark, Romney lost a extensive Florida and Ohio ruling and returned we observed money subject concerns staggering after that. in certainty, the 40 seven% remark is consequently of the judicial rulings, because of the fact because of the fact the judges smashed on Romney's plan to disenfranchise democrats, Romney lost investment from his prosperous bodies and wall street. As of at present Obama is outspending Romney 4 to a million, and it will in simple terms widen.
2016-10-09 04:17:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by hickerson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
While I am not a legal expert, and I haven't read all of the Yahoo fine print on reporting people, I can tell you that you are completely wrong. It may be (and I believe is) against policy in this community; you "loose standing" if I remember right. Community policy and community standing are not law. If there is no law that covers harassing someone on myspace to the point that they commit suicide, unwarranted reporting of people in Yahoo Answers had no legal repercussions.
2007-12-25 10:46:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by gwava0 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It should be but since this site is owned by a private corporation the law has no say in it.
2007-12-25 10:39:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by MY NAME MICHELLE I HATE AMERICA 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did you know it's against the law to report someone on here if they haven't done anything wrong?
Yes it is, and I'm looking into it.
There ya go Sparky, see if that works for ya.
2007-12-25 10:46:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by N S 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
hahahahahahaahaha 30 days in jail right >> or maybe handcuffed to a banquet table even?? mj
2007-12-25 10:40:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by mjbrightergem33 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, it's not. However, it should be against the law to use grammar like that.
2007-12-25 10:41:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by gofolite1 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Shhhh they are watching you
2007-12-25 10:39:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are not correct.
2007-12-25 10:40:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by DaveNCUSA 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it isn't.
2007-12-25 10:39:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by iNsTaNt pUdDiNhEaD 6
·
0⤊
0⤋