I'd like to hear other fans' view on the matter. It gets *so old* seeing the same teams play each other so many times through the season.
2007-12-25 07:40:24 · 16 answers · asked by breath_of_fire2101 1 in Sports ➔ Baseball
Its cool the way it is...would like maybe 2 more teams added. My Astros will have the Yankees/Boston be here for the first time in Houston...not a fan of Boston or Yankees, but I have been wanting this to happen for years....I respect those two teams and want to be able to see them:)
2007-12-25 08:22:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes for me, it is great when teams can get the chance to take a break from this regular schedule, and get to see teams and stadiums, that they won't otherwise see during the regular season, but it would also get old, if they play a same team twice in the same season every year, and mainly this is in cites that have more then one baseball team like Chicago, New York, etc. But don't forget that there are seasons when tams may move out of ther old season, and then the next season, move into a new stadium. Now there can also be fans that are against interleague, but really during th whole year, you don't see very many match ups between a National League team and american League team, other thne during spring training, interleague, the all-star game, and the World Series, and only 1 team from each league can make it that far. But it seems that what we have of interleague is what we are going to get, but sometimes it is nice when you don't have a lot of interleague games, and to fill up your schedule, throw on games, that you might nto see a team that maybe 2 series a year, in both stadiums.
2007-12-25 14:28:24 · answer #2 · answered by staggmovie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd prefer to see the interleague games eliminated, mainly due to the fact that the same teams play each other every year and the notion of having "new teams" visiting has proven false. Meanwhile, you're relegated to one visit a year from a team in the same league!
Just another bad idea from BALCO Bud Selig.
2007-12-25 11:02:07 · answer #3 · answered by DoneWithThisPlace 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think the number of interleague games is fine as is. Of course my opinion is probably a little biased since I am a Mets fan who has to watch their team get killed against all AL teams other than the Yankees.
2007-12-25 08:08:42 · answer #4 · answered by sj931 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i be attentive to fairly some persons are adversarial, yet i like it. interior the final couple of years they have been getting greater creative than in simple terms having comparable city or state communities play. There are such large opportunities. The Dodgers and Yankees have met greater cases interior the worldwide sequence than any others communities, so an interleague sequence could be relaxing and a submit season sequence no longer likely. there are a number of different opportunities.
2016-10-09 04:12:27 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, I would love to see more interleague regular season games
2007-12-25 16:45:53 · answer #6 · answered by EnberWolfe 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm okay with the teams they play every year they play different teams , but like example the Yankees always play the Mets
2007-12-25 07:44:09 · answer #7 · answered by Janet ♥(YFFL) 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like it, it gives fans a chance in AL and NL cities a chance to see teams they wouldn't get to watch play otherwise.
2007-12-25 23:22:00 · answer #8 · answered by SFA Cutie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It should be reduced to a 153 game season. It's way to diluted with marginal talent. The season begins in the snow and ends in the snow. It's ridiculous.
2007-12-25 07:47:09 · answer #9 · answered by WooleyBooley again 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't think they should add more interleague games, I just wonder why they all have to be lumped into June. Why not spread them out more evenly?
2007-12-25 11:20:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋