I would rather rip out my own fingernails one at a time and then use them to gauge out my own eyeballs than vote for Hillary Clinton.
Why? I'm stuck with the floundering phony as my senator (don't blame me, I voted for the other guy!) and she's done JACK in that position. How can I expect her to be benefical as President? Not to mention, she hasn't run a city. Or a state. Or even a bake sale. How does that qualify her to be a leader of the free world? IMO: it doesn't.
2007-12-25 14:31:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by zippythejessi 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
No. First of all, she wouldn't even have a chance if she wasn't married to President Clinton.... somebody's name is not a good reason to vote for that somebody.
Beyond that, one reason is that I have noticed, read about, and heard from various sources that she is essentially a party puppet. I DO NOT want a president who just follows the directives of a political party.... I'd like a president who thinks for themselves.
Personally, i think she'll have a hard time even getting the Democratic nomination, because it's just plain reality that there are who-knows-how-many people who will refuse to vote for her strictly based on gender. I'm NOT one of them myself, but i know people who are.... I guess the only thing she's got going in this respect is that her strongest Dem. opponent is Black (i know he's actually not Af.Amer. but he looks it and that's what matters to those racists out there)
Democrats are inbtwn a rock and hard place if you ask me :)
2007-12-27 07:44:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by n8dog021 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would not vote for Hillary as she is the most corrupt person that I know of.
2007-12-28 18:11:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Disco Diva 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Hillary Clinton is the Democrat nominee for President I will vote for her. However, at this point I am a John Edwards supporter. The first thing I don't like about Hillary is that she chose New York so she could run. It seems to me that our Senators and Representatives ought to have significant time living in a state before representing it. I like Edwards because at this point he seems to be a candidate that recognizes the assault on the United States middle class and will do something to cease the assault and help restore the American middle class to a place of strength.
2007-12-25 07:14:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sean 6
·
4⤊
4⤋
Ye s, I will vote for her . We need chances ,and I really believe that she will do a better job. This world is up sidedown and maybe a woman could make the difference. it`s couldn`t be worse then it is now.
2007-12-28 10:54:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by women 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would not want to vote for her for primery, because she is another corporate pig like george bush. But I have to say she is still better thousand time for Amerca than George Bush. As her husband did 8 years I think she would follow the same path clean up American debt that most 3 recent Repubs Prez had accumulated(ten trillion dollars by now). For the same reason if Hillary past primery, she still be 100 times or more better than any ten debt builder republican candidats. I just worry too much how much republicans build up the debt for our children and grand children. Of course GOP wants to build US debt up, because they are the one who have money to buy those debt and they will have more power to control what going on in this country.You and I work hard every day just enough to get by of the next pay check, not gonna have anything to say. I ignored all issues especially "TERROR" because Bush is Terror himself. The truth and facts that just come out lately help me see better that Bush(and his cronies) had created his own ennemy.
2007-12-25 08:31:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by bucktoui 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
I would never vote for Hillary Clinton because both she and Bill have shown that they cannot be trusted. They blatantly lie to us and will say anything to whomever is listening what they want to hear. Hillary spends 90% of her time BLAMING Pres. Bush for all the ailments of the world. He is not running against her and I probably wouldn't vote for him but that is the past. I am so tired of the 'blame game'. I only want to hear what the candidates intend to do and how they intend to pay for it.
I would not vote for Hillary because there is too much secrecy in Bill's administration and the part Hillary plays.
I want answers about Foster's suicide and why his files were immediately cleared out. I want to know why she and Bill do not want her files released. I want to know why Sandy Berger go away with destroying security files and will again be eligible for a security clearance. I want to know what went on in what is called 'Arkansas politics'. I want to know about all the foreign money the Clinton's received and rewarded claiming they did not know it was illegal.
I would not vote for Hillary because all these questions remain unanswered. I would not vote for Hillary because they promises all these "gifts" while we will have to pay the bill for them. I would not vote for Hillary because she changes her stripes according to the polls: today: strident, tomorrow: soft and feminine. I would not vote for Hillary because she relies on slander to vehemently attack the competion via he 'gofers'.
Hillary is dangerous and not fit to be president.
The Clinton aristocracy must end!
2007-12-25 07:25:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
YES, i would vote for her, she is the type of women who isnt going to take ****, besides i know that with her husband, she and bill can get us out of debt and out of this stupid war. plus she is a women, and it is about time that we had a women president. this men have had their chance, now its our turn. we cant possibly ***** up as bad as they have in the past.
2007-12-27 15:12:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by sunshine 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally, I have mixed feelings about Hilary. I think she's a smart woman, and it would definitely be good to have her as the president, but still, I do agree that she is power hungry. Hmm.. I don't know.
What I do know is if I am not 100% sure I want that person to be president, then they shouldn't be.
2007-12-25 08:41:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Medina B 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
I have not decided yet for whom I shall vote but she is high on my probable list. The reasons are two fold. She does have the experience of knowing how things get done in the white house, and she has the very close advise of the last president who had the country on a sound financial footing. This country was moving in good directions under the Clinton administration.
2007-12-25 07:24:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by JOE N 4
·
3⤊
6⤋