2007-12-25 01:56:38 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think Yahoo should do away with violations all together. With violations,there can never really be free speech.
2007-12-25 02:48:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
yes, but it is not practical because their servers would be overloaded with retaliation reporting.
best way to deal with it is to only allow serious violation reporting - ie life threatening - where a real person actually looks at the answer. Anyone who reports a minor violation under this system would have their account suspended.
2007-12-25 02:56:40 · answer #2 · answered by PD 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES
Actually the Yamster is going against the Constitution by finding users guilty without allowing us to face our accusers.
And for those that are not familiar with California Corporate Law. A Corp. can not make rules or By Laws that supersede the Constitution. Maybe in some States that is allowed but not in CA where the Yahoo is incorporated.
2007-12-25 02:51:46 · answer #3 · answered by whirling W dervish 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In an ideal world, sure. But unfortunately, this Yahoo world is populated by those who use mass attacks to get accounts deleted. So if you violated the wrong person and it was made public, you'd quickly be gone.
2007-12-25 02:15:50 · answer #4 · answered by mommanuke 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I think it would be fair. At the very least we should know who did the violating and whether its justified.
2007-12-25 05:20:16 · answer #5 · answered by CAPTAIN BEAR 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've beat my brains out about many 'parts' that I believe should be 'outed' about askers of Qs, those who answer, and YAs lack of response to complaints about being 'dinged' for what one would consider a reasonable answer.
I've given up !!
That doesn't mean that I have 'repented', quite the opposite, but it all falls on deaf ears and the n'er do wells on YA are still allowed to function - beats me !!
2007-12-25 03:59:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. If one is violated for any number of reasons the one who violated them should have the decency to explain why they were violated. I have my doubts as to the appeals process YA has in place.
2007-12-25 02:03:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
NO, it would just lead to retaliation. The system could be better. I just got a violation notice for a question that seemed fair to me. I did state that everyone hates neo-cons, but doesnt' everybody, but neo-cons, hate neo-cons? I didn't say neo-cons were evil, just that they were hated. I wanted to find out which neo-con lover reported me, but it is probably better that I don't know.
2007-12-25 02:34:59 · answer #8 · answered by Shane 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. I admit to reporting and would welcome that very much. I've been calling for an end to anonymous reporting for over a year because I expect it would expose a lot of the loudest free speech advocates especially on the right as hypocrites and serial bogus reporters.
I'm willing to defend any abuse report I sent in
2007-12-25 02:08:32 · answer #9 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yes, and even if you did the violating, explain the said violation and most importantly tell who reported it!
2007-12-25 01:59:39 · answer #10 · answered by pacer 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋