English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Scenerio:
You are happily married and live in Massachusetts, but have lost your job. Finding another one in you area is not likely and the place where your field is growing is California, so you go to California where you think you have a better shot. On your second day there, you get in a horrendous car wreck and are hospitalized for the next four months. Under Massachusetts HB 113, a court shall issue a warrant for your arrest because you left Massachusetts for over 90 days without making "provisions for the support" of your spouse.

Should this be the law in all states?

2007-12-24 17:50:30 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

5 answers

this law does not apply to this case.

2007-12-24 18:03:06 · answer #1 · answered by something crazy 4 · 1 0

this law was meant for someone who abandons the spouse without any plans for support as soon as they get settled, as the person left to find a job, and this was interrupted by a car accident then this law should not apply to this particular case unless the person that left had no intention of supporting the spouse after they left regardless of the accident, yes this should be a law in all states to prevent deadbeats from just leaving the state so they don't have to support the other person and the children, which is a very common occurrence, my ex ran to another state and tried to hide

2007-12-25 01:59:59 · answer #2 · answered by Dale T 4 · 2 0

Why do you say married men. Wouldn't it be the same for married women? I'm sure it's only if the spouse pressed charges, like if you left and didn't tell them. Anyone who knew why their spouse was going and was ok with it would never press charges.

2007-12-25 02:00:54 · answer #3 · answered by Kimpossible 2 · 1 0

What a stupid law. In most cases, both people work, so the spouse SHOULD be supporting themselves.

2007-12-25 02:00:28 · answer #4 · answered by cindos_69 5 · 0 0

no. that.s silly and if it.s law it needs changing to a different one

2007-12-25 01:55:00 · answer #5 · answered by the_silverfoxx 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers