2007-12-24 17:03:32 · 5 answers · asked by Micheala #1 Fan of WDPLM-2 4 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
OK, but isn't it more effective to cripple infrastructure without destroying life, i.e., plant life, and the atmosphere, then take the land. They don't make anymore land. Like China would love the land with all their people. Okay, I'm a conspiracy theory groupie.
2007-12-24 17:14:12 · update #1
Well, an E-Bomb only stops electricity, which will comeback on sometime in a few days, weeks, and months at most.
Chemichal, Nuclear, Biological can kill millions of people.
2007-12-24 17:07:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Apple's negotiating with bin laden to make a iBomb, be worried about that. takes down the net, more effective than E-bomb and old fashion nuke-bomb combined.
i.e people cant ask stupid questions on y/a anymore. Okay I'm a crap theory fan.
2007-12-25 21:10:29 · answer #2 · answered by Blue 1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Electro magnetic pulse will disable electronic equipment and its posible our defences could be comprimized with one. However its not sustainable to do damage to humans becose it would reqire great amounts of power to last long enough to cook you. We are by the way developing microwave wepons that are focused in a narow beem and would allow a sweep of a battlefield and all the solders would disarm themselves due to the intense build up of heat to their metal weopons and armor, or so ive been told from an old boss i used to work for who had been privy to this type of tech back in the erly 80s
2007-12-24 17:16:04 · answer #3 · answered by Manwae 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I say we should be more concerned about the F-bomb.
2007-12-24 17:07:07 · answer #4 · answered by HellGuard99 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, nuclear weapons are still the BMOC.
2007-12-25 07:32:53 · answer #5 · answered by Dr. R 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋