was 911 an inside job?

Question

dont be childish and name call answer the question and give a good and i mean a good reason why you think that

Answer 1

No.
I saw the first plane go in. I was there.

But the connections between Bush and the Bin Laden family and the House of Saad are freaky!
As are the close ties Cheney has with them as well.
All old oil associations.

Answer 2

I can't say it was an inside job, but I do see many inaccuratcies in the NIST report. And the way the feds react when someone questions how they came up with some of there conclusions.Makes them seem guilty. I just don't want to beleive our government would do that. But I can't say for sure it was not an inside job. All these other comments come off like they are NSA operatives or structural engineers and know all the facts. They have an opinion (like me ) and thats it.And someone explain WTC 7, the feds still haven't.

Answer 3

No! 9/11 wasn't an inside job. The World Trade Towers weren't detonated, and a plane did crash into the Pentagon. What did happen was that the Bush administration used these events as a pretext for invading Iraq. While the initial invasion was success, the subsequent occupation has been a disaster, and the blame rests on the Bush administration.

Answer 4

No, 911 is the number you call for emergencies.

If you're referring to the attack on America on 9/11, no it was not an inside job.

Answer 5

If it quacks like a duck and looks like a duck most likely is a duck.

The conspiresy advocates are nuts. This was not an inside job. The US has never waged disaster upon it's own people.

Saying that 9/11m was a put up job is paramount to saying that Pearl Harbor was a put up job as an excuse for the US to enter WW II

Answer 6

How about I was there....I saw the planes fly into the towers....I spent 8 days picking body parts out.....OBL took credit....Please loosen your hat it is a tad tight...the islamic supporters to this day "celebrate" his victory.....

Answer 7

Was it an inside job? No.

Reasons are as follows:

OVERWHELMING SCIENCE AGAINST THE CONSPIRACY
--Every single published expert (in demolition or civil engineering) in the world has rejected the so-called "science" of the conspiracy theorists. It's really amazing.

LACK OF A MOTIVE THAT MAKES SENSE
--Money Motive - Why would Bush (or whoever) take such a risk as doing 9/11 when he could make all the money he wants by: receipt of lobbying, giving himself options, awarding pork barrel contracts, getting kickbacks, etc., etc.

--Insider Trading - All financial transactions are a matter of public record. Anyone making money off of 9/11 would be instantly exposed. Buying “put options” is like screaming “Here I am. Come and arrest me!” You can’t do these transactions anonymously.

Of course, the FBI checked all 9-11 associated profit making and found nothing significant . See Point 6, at:
http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=pubs-english&y=2006&m=August&x=20060828133846esnamfuaK0.2676355

--Oil motive - Conspiracy folks claim that we invaded Iraq “to get its oil.” We haven’t got any, nor will we. We are not allowed to take oil out of Iraq. We buy it like everyone else.
Also, there’s nothing magical about oil: Getting money is also good because it can buy oil. However, we’ve SPENT a trillion dollars in Iraq. That’s a lot of oil we could have bought.

--Military spending - Military spending goes on all the time, in war & in peace. These guys make tons of money. Why risk killing 3000 Americans for what you already have?

--Other Vague motives - Conspiracy folks say we did 9/11 so we could “further our agenda in the middle east.” A vague, meaningless motive. Vague claims are usually false.

SECRECY
--As they say, 3 people can keep a secret IF 2 of them are dead. So many people would have to be involved that SOMEONE should have come forward by now. At least one single, solitary person MUST leak, even if accidently, SOMETHING.

KNOWN KILLERS
--Al-Qaeda is the self-admitted agent with documented motives. In 1993, they attacked the WTC using a truck bomb and they were behind the attack on the US in Mogadishu. In 1996, Bin Laden issued a fatwa (basically a declaration of war) against the United States. In 2000 al-Qaeda bombed the missile destroyer U.S.S. Cole near Yemen, killing 17 servicemen. They bombed trains in London and Spain, and have been active in Algeria, Somalia and Kenya, Pakistan, etc, etc. The 20th terrorist, Zacarias Moussaoui, admitted guilt in court.

VAGUENESS OF THE PERPETRATOR
--The conspiracy theorists never say exactly who is behind the 9/11 inside job. This is a sign that the claim is false.

The conspiracists are afraid to name a specific person because then we could examine that person & instantly prove the conspiracy people wrong. So, they hide behind vagueness.

FROM THE HIJACKERS TO OSAMA
The 19 hijackers came to the US years before 9-11 and took flight-training & physical training to prepare for the attack. They came into contact with hundreds of people who were subsequently debriefed, allowing us to reconstruct their movements. They were funded by monies that have been traced directly back to Osama Bin Laden. They were on the flight manifests & were caught on security cameras. The flight recorder from Flight 93 caught their Arabic orders at the end (“Bring it down” and “Allah is great”). Etc.

WRONG PSYCHOLOGY
--Believe it not, most politicians are not murderers. Very few people have the psychological makeup to be mass-murderers, & they usually show signs of it beforehand.
==================
THE COLLAPSE OF WTC7

See NIST’s (National Institute of Science & Technology) description of the collapse of WTC7 at
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc_062907.html

Even though they were NOT hit by the jets, numerous buildings over a wide area were hit by debris from the collapsing towers and were destroyed.

This includes: The Marriott World Trade Center , 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center, and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church (which wasn’t even in the WTC complex). The Deutsche Bank Building was also outside the WTC complex & was massively damaged, and was declared a total loss in 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_attack#Damage

Hence, no particular explanation of the collapse of WTC7 is really needed. It collapsed as did many other buildings that were all hit by debris.

However, the specifics for WTC7 are:
According to NIST "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." See http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=5#wtc7

WTC7 was only 400 feet from WTC1. Since WTC1 was over 1300 feet tall, as they peeled away, the large perimeter columns from WTC1 struck WTC7 & many other buildings with terrific force due to their high starting position. Archival photos shows perimeter columns lying on the ground up to WTC7. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

In addition, WTC7 was built straddling a Con-Edison substation. This meant that its walls had to carry a tremendous amount of force and were vulnerable to impact. In addition, WT7 contained numerous fuel tanks for generators, some holding 6000 gallons of fuel, & this contributed to its destruction.

Finally, at least 6 fires started in WTC7, each of which was described as “large” but there was no water to fight them. The fires were left to burn because the building started to lean and firefighters decided it was too dangerous to enter.

Workers testified that the east side slumped, then collapsed, pulling the rest of the building with it.

Technical article on collapse of WTC7

http://www.structuremag.org/Archives/2007-11/SF-WTC7-Gilsanz-Nov07.pdf

Answer 8

It was Muslims "inside" a plane

Answer 9

watch
zeitgeist movie part 2

Answer 10

No it was not. 9 /11 commission report ...read it.