Could this be told as a story instead of the big bang?

Question

*Not invented by me.

First was nothing.
A fold in the void separates fullness of nothing, and absence of fullness.
Which are the same in essence but opposed.
Thus the first pair of poles was made.
Fullness of nothing was on top,
Nothingness of something under.
By that occasion the void splits again.
It is at the same time definite
And not definite.
On one side goes definition and on the other, non definition.
This feeds again the opposition between fullness and nothingness, since we now have 4 parts in the void.
And, this indicates an evolution.
A change.
A flow.
The flow itself is an entity feeding the pole of fullness.
A succession of other folds are drawn in the void,
until the potential at the poles is big enough to shape a wave.
Which is not yet matter.
The wave is an entity and again feed the primal pole of fullness.
Many waves cumulate until they build a charge.
And light is made from that charge.
Again two new entities light and charge feed the poles.

Answer 1

His first sentence states there is nothing; the second sentence states, "A fold in the void..." which indicates that there is something created between the first sentence and the second because to fold implies there is something to fold. That is simply a restatement of the false adage that something can be created out of nothing. In actuality there is no such thing as nothing. Conceiving of nothing is an impossibility.

Why do I say this? It is because if you ever find nothing (a void), you will soon realize there is something. That something will be you the conscious finder and you will be God and have to create a universe out of nothing in order to keep going mad from loneliness.

I don't think this would be accepted as an alternative to the "Big Bang" explanation for the origin of the universe. Even it has the problem of trying to conceive of the nothing (void) that preceded the creation of space-time by that Big Bang.

Good luck in finding the void, good health, peace and LOVE!

Answer 2

Well, it starts off pretty poetic, but it starts getting a little too literal near the middle, no matter how many adjectives-as-nouns that are used.

In the writer's defense, it's pretty hard to aim to describe a technical process in a poetic way. Even describing it colloquially is rather challenging, as evidenced in Hawking's for-general-public writings.

Answer 3

Sounds amazingly like Genesis

Answer 4

Pretty good! How about: First there was nothing no-thing. God encompassed nothing. From no-thing He created some-thing. There is no beginning and there is no end to a Perfect Existence.

Answer 5

Yes, that could be told as a story.

Answer 6

I gotta wonder what this dude was smoking when he conjured up this bit of psychobabble...

Answer 7

that was good...