They are both terrible!!!
2007-12-24 12:29:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
both are tragic and a sad comment on our times that either could happen.
slaughter of the unborn is epidemic and it is difficult to reconcile that this is happening in record numbers. most of these children would be born without loving parents to nurture, guide and protect them but who knows how many killed had the potential to find cures for dreaded diseases or even perhaps become a great states-person to bring peace to the world.
i believe that a woman should chose what happens to her own body but am conflicted that this would kill an innocent who through no fault of their own will never have a chance at life. it is sad to think that some have done this numerous times and rather than take responsibilities for their actions, chose abortion as a method of birth control.
both men an women should be held accountable for this action but sadly, it is the woman who must live with the grief and guilt that most will suffer, if not immediately, then later when they reflect on it. i know some will not be bothered at all but most of the women i know that have made that choice do feel remorse.
people are outraged that Hitler was allowed to kill and slaughter so many and wonder how this was allowed to happen for so long and people feel outrage when animals are killed but yet they accept abortion as a matter of fact.
i wish people would be more responsible and that no more innocents have to die because of carelessness and irresponsibility. please think before acting on you primitive desires and use protection. this doesn't seem too much to ask of a thinking reasonable person.
2007-12-25 08:30:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe the wars Hitler caused killed from 35 to 50 million.
And yes, over 45 million abortions have taken place in America since 1973.
I am deeply troubled by abortion, but even I wouldn't put the two in the same category. Although I can understood why some would.
2007-12-24 12:44:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
In your OPINION and wacked out religous world it's killing - most people call it abortion. FYI, at the stage a pregnancy is terminated it's not a life. BTW, your numbers are bit off - Hitler killed more and Roe V Wade 0.
2007-12-24 16:35:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Wow, what a loaded question. I think Roe v Wade would have to be considered the worst, if for no other reason than the numbers. But maybe too, because of the killing of helpless, defenseless, innocent unborns.
2007-12-24 12:42:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by robbie 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
Roe V Wade is what the people of the USA want. It's the law of the land.
2007-12-24 12:52:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Roe vs Wade. Killing the innocent
2007-12-24 12:29:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Roe, we were able to stop Hitler, liberals defend killing unborn babies and stop us from saving them.
2007-12-24 12:31:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by netnazivictim 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
50 million i think you better see dr. for a check up
2007-12-24 14:41:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
The leader that does not serve his or her own; via varied beliefs.
2007-12-24 13:52:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by dollysj 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Are you for life only before birth or are you also against war and capital punishment?
2007-12-24 12:37:13
·
answer #11
·
answered by TJTB 7
·
4⤊
2⤋