English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-24 09:58:01 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Anthropology

15 answers

nope, most likely from africa, then the humans migrated all over, and then they started to cross into north america, via the ice age land bridge of the bering strait (connecting russia and alaska).

2007-12-24 10:06:09 · answer #1 · answered by *I Want To Hold Your Hand* 6 · 3 0

No humans came first from africa. At that time all humans where black. The reason the north america had a human settelment even before any european had come is because ages ago the whole world was a single continent so humans spread to all possible place he could. But the first human evolved in Africa. Because the oldest fossils of humans come from Africa.
Because the whole world was a single continent so human spread to America Australia Asia and Europe. As the continents started splitting human settelment in America and Australia were isolated. But Asia Africa and Europe remained together so people could communicate but the native of America and Australia were isolated for a ling time so they evolved different culture and also were a little different from others.

2007-12-24 23:56:48 · answer #2 · answered by Vaibhav Dwivedi 4 · 0 1

No. The earliest evidence of humans in North America has been dated to no more then 20,000 years ago (Yes. there's the Brazil site with a claimed occupancy of 30,000 years ago) That's not much compared to Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal dates of 40,000 plus years ago.

Africa is today seen as humanities birthplace. Our line split off from apes perhaps 8 million years ago Africa is where most of the intermediate remains are found.

Besides the recent occupancy dates the problem with the Americas is that there are no apes. The new world monkeys are significantly different from apes so there's no chance they have any links to humans.

2007-12-24 11:12:37 · answer #3 · answered by icabod 7 · 2 0

So far the oldest human found was a female in Africa. They once thought it could had been Asia, but fossils and other artifacts that were much older then the ones in Asia. Africa until they find somebody older.

2007-12-24 10:20:02 · answer #4 · answered by wind champ 4 · 0 0

No and pretty in pink is only 1/2 right.
The bible reveals that mans home was a garden in Eden Genesis 2:8.
Because of the rivers mentioned it is indicated that its location is relatively near the place of mankind's early post flood civilization. The view generally accepted by scholars is expressed by P. J. Wiseman as follows:
ALL THE REAL EVIDENCE WE HAVE, THAT OF GENESIS AND ARCHEOLOGY, AND OF THE TRADITIONS OF MEN, point to the Mesopotamian plain as the oldest home of man. Far East civilizations, whether Chinese or Indian, cannot compete with this land in the antiquity of its people, for it can easily sustain its claim to be the cradle of civilization!

2007-12-24 10:16:59 · answer #5 · answered by bugsie 7 · 1 2

No, the North Americans come from Europe & Africa mainly.

2007-12-24 13:17:51 · answer #6 · answered by noodles 2 · 0 1

Interesting question. The oldest known form of life was found in Carlsbad Caverns

2007-12-25 20:41:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Africa,Sahara.

2007-12-26 11:32:12 · answer #8 · answered by imsety 6 · 0 0

No mostly came from Africa.The early humans were nomads and spread to the rest of the world. The genes of our ancestors are spread to us and is up to us to spread it to our offsprings.

2007-12-24 20:58:31 · answer #9 · answered by Annika A 3 · 1 0

According to most theories humans came from Africa. Where they evolved and traveled over time. Until becoming the homo sapien sapiens that we are today.

*Don't call me an evolutionist I'm just stating theories*

2007-12-24 10:06:35 · answer #10 · answered by Emily G 2 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers