English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-24 08:20:30 · 11 answers · asked by Gator 6 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Santa is a Republican. He outsources the work to make toys to highly under paid elf's at the North Pole. He only works one day a year. He works his reindeer so hard that one of them has a bad drinking problem & abuses the poor thing by making him fly in front so Santa can take advantage of his bright red nose.

2007-12-24 08:32:58 · answer #1 · answered by donronsen 6 · 2 3

What is this deal with US citizens and Liberalism? You all talk as though it were some kind of disease. It was Liberalism that brought the UK into aspiring to become a humanitarian society. Ok, we're still not there but is has had the effect of maintaining the health and education of countless millions.
Do the citizens of the USA only believe in self interest? Where does that square with their claims to be Christian?
I (thank God) am not Christian but it seems to me that the Nation which claims that belief as a tenet of national identity is far closer to the Pharisees than to Jesus.
God help America! No one else can, although many of us would like to! Sorry for the diatribe, Merry Christmas.

2007-12-24 09:11:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What your history lesson has left out is that the Democrats who unfavorable emancipation and started the Klan were the southern conservatives who left the democrats over the civil rights law of the Sixties and found a sparkling place of residing interior the Republican celebration. Your premise is for this reason too unsuitable to be credible. paying for a suitable Bowl ring would not make you the champion, and co opting a celebration does now no longer credit you with its former accomplishments. As for President Obama, the guy might now no longer be interior the White house had the Republican social amassing no longer betrayed its usual conservative electorate by means of wallowing interior the pony excrement of evangelical fascism. while the GOP nominated yet yet another apologist for the excessive precise it drove the moderates who provided the Republican majority to vote Democrat. Obama might now no longer be President if the alternative had now no longer been so unacceptable. Blaming the electorate is stupid, considering the fact which you picked your candidate. We purely picked the least objectionable of the two recommendations offered. Whining approximately Obama is likewise stupid, thinking he remains making extra experience than Senator McCain and his insistence that our finance complications is additionally solved by using extra tax cuts! because of the indisputable fact which you Republicans proved you're able to desire to no longer do the interest we've been given somebody else. He in spite of the reality that hasn't handed the probationary era, whether subsequently far he, a minimum of, is making an truthful attempt. i'm no longer delighted, whether as i discussed i replaced into only given 2 selections.

2016-11-24 23:00:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Liberal Santa give away stuff

Conservative Santa love to hold little kids = Foley , Craig

2007-12-24 08:50:10 · answer #4 · answered by The One 2 · 1 1

Santa Claus is a jolly ole elf, full of mirth and joy, and his belly shake like a bowl full of jelly. I don't think he has a political position.

2007-12-24 08:25:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The worst Christmas song I've heard this year has to be Bruce Springsteen's tuneless rendition of "Santa Claus is Coming to Town." Yet by forcing me to think about the lyrics, the Boss delivered a flash of insight: conservatives do the jolly old elf a grave wrong in calling him the patron saint of something-for-nothing Democrats. We should claim Santa as our own.

Listing who's been bad and good, naughty and nice? Warning us not to cry (play the victim) or pout (cast blame and act entitled)? There's little difference, when you think about it, between St. Nick and St. Newt. George Will himself could hardly be more stern and judgmental. Santa Claus rightly understood is a far cry from the socialist redistribution of John Edwards or the syrupy hope of Obama.


Even if recast from the unnerving red-clad (red, Republican, get it?) bearded geezer of yore to the more kid-friendly persona of Mr. Rogers, as David Grimes recommended in Sunday's Denver Post, Father Christmas remains a no-nonsense apostle of good conduct, rigorous standards, and time-honored traditions. The "Santa's Coming" song, even when butchered by Springsteen, is just the opposite of that favorite left-liberal anthem, "Anything Goes."

Jeffrey Bell, writing in the Weekly Standard, offers a great Christmas gift for all of us on the right with this masterful summary of what the left really wants -- a total repudiation of St. Nicolas and his strictness, a hot revolution that would melt the North Pole faster than you can say Al Gore:

"The goal of the left is the liberation of mankind from traditional institutions and codes of behavior, especially moral codes. It seeks a restoration (or achievement) of a state of nature, one of absolute individual liberty--universal happiness without the need for laws. The proposed political way stations chosen by the left in its drive toward this vision have [included]: abolition of private property (socialism); prohibition of Christianity and/or propagation by the political elite of a new civil religion to replace it; confiscatory taxation, especially at death; regulation of political speech to limit the ability of certain individuals or classes to affect politics; the takeover of education to instill new values and moral habits in the population; confiscation of privately held firearms; gradual phasing out of the nation-state; displacement of the traditional family in favor of child-rearing by an enlightened governmental elite; and the inversion of sexual morality to elevate recreational sex and reduce the prestige of procreative sex."

Some list, huh? It adds up to the exact opposite of "be good for goodness' sake." And notice, by the way, that this injunction from Santa Claus, courtesy of songwriter Haven Gillespie, doesn't merely appeal to utilitarian self-interest. Rather it invokes a moral absolute which, when obeyed, is its own reward. A pitch-perfect echo of Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations" and "Theory of Moral Sentiments," in what you thought was just an empty Yuletide ditty. Mirabile dictu!

Lest we forget, however, the true reason for this season is neither St. Nick on the right nor Holiday Hillary on the left, but the baby born in Bethlehem. The Prince of Peace transcends liberal and conservative. He is a miracle even more mysterious than a large man ascending a small chimney. None of us is good enough to deserve His unspeakable gift, salvation and life eternal, yet none of us is so bad as to be disqualified from it.

2007-12-24 08:26:38 · answer #6 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 0 0

Of course, he not only gives away toys, treats and other gifts but he is happy like most liberals. He is generous unlike conservatives, he cares about kids, unlike conservatives, and he works with people who are vertically challenged and doesn't mind a reindeer with a shiny red nose. He is inclusinve and does not discriminate.

2007-12-24 08:28:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

No. He gives away his own stuff. Liberals only like to give away other people's stuff.

2007-12-24 08:28:18 · answer #8 · answered by DOOM 7 · 5 2

No, liberals give away OTHER PEOPLE'S stuff.

Big Difference.

2007-12-24 08:28:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

no because he doesn't bill those presents to millions of hardworking americans who are already purchaseing presents for their children.

2007-12-24 08:43:46 · answer #10 · answered by TEXASmommy 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers