I liked it. for 1 will smith is a great actor and 2 it looked great!! i found my self looking at the entire movie screen finding little things from new york city. their could have been more sceens of him scavenging and trying to survive. And if you didnt like it tell me why. to the most discriptive answer i will give points
2007-12-24 07:58:05 · 16 answers · asked by bloodsuckenleach 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
well, he really didnt have to scavenge all that much because he had like a million years worth of non-perishable food in his house. I think the main point was that once everyone died his search for the cure became his life. The things the movie did show was his attempt at staying sane. It was sorta like him being stuck in a huge solitary confinement cell in a prison. Theres no one to talk to. the only difference really was that it was for.. what, 3 years? Imagine how strong you'd have to be mentally to deal with that. On top of that he had to deal with the fear of being eaten alive everynight when he went to bed.
I do think it was a great movie. It was scary and sad at the same time. It showed how us humans can have great ingenuity and at the same time our own intelligence can be our downfall.
2007-12-24 08:12:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was a pretty good movie. Things that were bad about it include...
1) Will Smith. Really good actors make you forget they are an actor. Will Smith is always Will Smith. Not that he's a terrible actor though.
2) The infected didn't look very real. I don't think animation was top notch.
3) Kind of left a lot unexplained. Like how they kept getting smarter.
Good things...
1) Story was interesting enough for a zombie movie.
2) Sam
3) I thought it was interesting how there was a leader zombie. Not sure why I thought that was so cool but it just was unexpected I guess.
Def. worth watching (for free on the internet, probably not in a theatre).
2007-12-24 08:03:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually I loved I a legend, great acng on will smiths part really good, i got into he movie and everything I even felt bad when he had to kill the dog. O but i felt like it should have been longer like you said scavenging and trying to survive and they could have added more details like another 45 minutes of them curing the people, or show how the disease spread.
O and Sweet Pea he was inside of a cage or whatever you want to call it if he would have thrown it he would not have killed the leader, JUST HIMSELF so pretty much he was going to die anyway so he was like ill just make sure ill kill the leader
2007-12-24 08:08:41 · answer #3 · answered by Kyle T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only interesting thing in the movie was will smith and his dog. The story's quite old, the concept quite worn out, and lack of charactors pretty much make it like an award movie like cast away. Its a great movie but not an enjoyable one.
2007-12-24 08:04:14 · answer #4 · answered by Lord Of Lust 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not bad, better than the first two versions. The one with Charlton Heston was just plain silly.
2007-12-24 08:01:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Will Smith's bank manager.
2007-12-24 08:03:10 · answer #6 · answered by Harry O 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't like Will smith anymore...especially after he started dating Tom Cruise.
2007-12-24 08:00:27 · answer #7 · answered by Geminat 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The way it was filmed was brilliant, but i think the ending could hav been different (like throwing the freakin' grenade)
2007-12-24 08:02:25 · answer #8 · answered by JoUrNaLiSt 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Genuinely great film, but with a crappy cop-out ending.
2007-12-24 08:05:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i wanted my 9 dollars back
2007-12-24 08:00:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋