During the Clintons tenure, every time one of their scandals or crimes were publicized, Hillary conducted intensive photo-ops, using Chelsea as a human shield to deflect criticism for her wrong-doing, like stealing FBI files, travelgate, whitewater, selling pardons, ripping off WH property, selling "over nights" in the Lincoln bedroom, sending thugs to intimidate withesses and scare women who had been intimate with Bill, to hold their tongues, obstructing justice, withholding evidence- just to name a few.
Hillary proclaimed to the media, any probing about Chelsea is taboo, while Chelsea was under-age; now that Chelsea is closer to 30, should the media abide with their past policy if Hillary continues to use her as a shield?
PS As if Hillary were elected, the scandals and abuse of power would not be as intense, when she was the first lady....
2007-12-24 06:32:45 · 8 answers · asked by ? 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
mezmarel....so if you and other liberals asist in sHrillery from being charged with a crime, it didn't happen? Is there any crime I listed that she is innocent? I think what you mean is that if Hillary escaped justice, she is innocent.... right.
2007-12-24 06:58:45 · update #1
are you kidding, the scandals and abuse of power would be awful, this is a very dangerous woman, and a threat to our entire country, she's a socialist, commie evil liar, and it gets worse
2007-12-24 06:46:50 · answer #1 · answered by poopsie 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I'm not certain what one would find regarding Chelsea from a probe into her life.....except that she is either whoafully uneducated about the scandals and tricky dealings her mom has been involved with or spear headed, or that she's just a brainwashed supporter...maybe its just as simple that regardless of what her mom has done, she's still her mom. Which is nice familiy wise, but pretty dumb for someone to put thier selfish desires or family over the welfare of the country itself.
2007-12-24 14:51:40 · answer #2 · answered by Nightwind 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Chelsea isn't running for anything, so how could HER personal life be germaine to anything regarding the election? Her behavior isn't up for scrutiny any more that any supporter of any candidate. If you support someone, would you want YOUR life scrutinized simply because you support a given candidate? I sure wouldn't, as I'm no more perfect than anybody else. Scrutinize Hillary and the other candidates all you want, but I say their families are NOT fair game, no matter what their age.
2007-12-24 14:41:48 · answer #3 · answered by Dances with Unicorns 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Since when does the fourth estate bow to the whims of a politician? What a bunch of pansy assed mouth pieces journalists have all become.
2007-12-24 14:39:09 · answer #4 · answered by Freethinker 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
A pass on what? Do you want investigations into Chelsea's personal life?
2007-12-24 14:38:36 · answer #5 · answered by dudefromnewmexico666 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
And I don't remember any abuse of power or scandals that were proven against the Clintons.........please list.
2007-12-24 14:52:28 · answer #6 · answered by Mezmarelda 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Not anymore.
2007-12-24 14:59:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If she's actually campaigning, she doesn't get a pass anymore.
2007-12-24 14:40:42 · answer #8 · answered by DOOM 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋