for a backpacK?
2007-12-24 04:05:56 · 32 answers · asked by refreshe123d 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I would, I did
2007-12-24 04:06:10 · update #1
so you guys don't like name brand?
2007-12-24 04:10:06 · update #2
Yes! You have to look good. I don't really use backpacks, but I've paid thousands of dollars for purses and bags.
2007-12-24 04:10:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hell no. All backpacks are going to wear down at some point.
2007-12-24 04:09:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would depend on its design too. I wouldn't spend money just for the sake of carrying a branded item.
2007-12-24 04:17:16 · answer #3 · answered by xxon_23 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rather spend that on a hand bag for me... a bag pack is a bag pack and it shouldn't be this much to carry books or whatever. At least a handbag completes an outfit
2007-12-24 04:27:29 · answer #4 · answered by Pirate ♥ Kitten 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nope. i did pay $100 for one that played music. but a lot of rich kids in my school's backpacks cost triple that and they dont even do anything!
2007-12-24 04:10:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the brand.
2007-12-24 04:15:23 · answer #6 · answered by Cooooool 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
not for run of the mill activity, but if I were going on some awesome long trip where I needed something special, I'd consider it.
2007-12-24 04:11:57 · answer #7 · answered by Ja Funmi dba Big Baby 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
unless it was the most amazing backpack ever
and if it had a lifetime warranty
2007-12-24 04:09:10 · answer #8 · answered by ♪♫Lynn♫♪ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a normal school backpack?
then no.
a hiking backpack is definiatly worth it.
2007-12-24 04:09:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way. Unless, it has a built-in Ipod and can minimize weight. Nah, I still don't think I would.
2007-12-24 04:10:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋