we live in a mad world ..
2007-12-24 01:50:18 · 19 answers · asked by Cal 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Actually it's a fallen world.Adam,and Eve rejected all the glory.
But this is the world we live in.Saddam was judged by the U.N he broke the resolutions.He was tried by his own people.He will be judged by God.He'll be in hell for his rejection of his son.
2007-12-24 03:53:03 · answer #1 · answered by ak6702 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
We did not judge Saddam, he was judged by an Iraqi court and found guilty in that court. Far as I know there have been no charges brought up against President Bush. What would you charge him with, doing the job he was elected to do? I can understand that to a Liberal that might be a crime.
2007-12-24 15:15:03 · answer #2 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Both are judged. Its just with Bush you don't wind up in a Baghdad dungeon for a sketch about "Strategery" or losing a football game(soccer for most Americans). You gotta love the USA. Only in America can you have the head of a branch of government come up with a word like "strategery" and laugh about it with out reprecussions(I'll bet GWB even laughed at "strategery").
Cheers
A.C.
PS
I respectfully disagree with "Lillian", keep asking questions like this. Your "stupidity" might not become you but it offers fodder for me and my fellow smart @$$es with views slightly right of political center. Keep on writing--we'll post more.
2007-12-24 21:49:04 · answer #3 · answered by PBFT Philosopher(Anti-Jonas) 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What are you saying? Liberals judge Bush all the time, just without evidence of wrong doing. Saddam gave us evidence for free, when he ordered his Republican Guard to rape, and murder innocent Men, Women, and children in Kuwait.
2007-12-24 12:02:19 · answer #4 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Bush has not violated the "crimes against humanity" sections of the World courts. In that I mean he has not used poison gas against an enemy as Saddam clearly did against the Kurds.
Bush may be an idiot but he is not guilty of genocide.
Have you not been paying attention?
2007-12-24 09:55:56 · answer #5 · answered by we_are_legion99 5 · 9⤊ 1⤋
Bush hasn't used chemical weapons on his own people. Bush hasn't systematically slaughtered all of those that oppose him. Bush's daughters aren't running amok killing people on a whim or raping and then killing them like Saddam's sons did. If you can't see the difference between the two then you are blinded by your hatred for Bush. That's like saying "why does anyone have the right to judge Hitler or Stalin." The differences are enormous and any sane person can see this.
2007-12-24 09:55:47 · answer #6 · answered by cmdrbnd007 6 · 11⤊ 3⤋
What rock have you been living under? Saddam was tried, convicted, sentenced, and hung by the very people that he abused for 35 years!
2007-12-24 09:56:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 1⤋
Oh we judge Bush all the time havent you read the stuff here?
Sadam on the other hand had the tendency to make the people that didn't like him go away... forever!
2007-12-24 09:52:35 · answer #8 · answered by Adeptus Astartes 5 · 8⤊ 2⤋
That's a question that only someone with no morals and no clue as to the difference between wrong and right would ask.
2007-12-24 10:10:19 · answer #9 · answered by jim h 6 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Bush is judged constantly as he should be, but Sadam is dead and a much easier target for those people that are oblivious and uninformed.
2007-12-24 10:51:55 · answer #10 · answered by HP 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋