English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

They need to do something to end it-

2007-12-24 02:23:50 · answer #1 · answered by KAREBEAR 4 · 2 0

I am probably in the minority when I say I feel the U.S. was justified in using nuclear bombs to end WWII. I have read estimates of the number of additional American lives which would have been lost if we had continued to try to end the war with conventional weapons. But it all depends on the circumstances, and how formidible the enemy is. The use of nuclear bombs in most instances would be overkill. Just as you wouldn't use a shotgun to kill a fly in your house.

2007-12-24 09:45:55 · answer #2 · answered by Glenn S 3 · 0 0

Using nuclear warfare is not always the best answer I believe. There must be other ways. I just wish one would learn from the past situations.

2007-12-24 16:16:24 · answer #3 · answered by Oriental Sous-chef 3 · 0 0

sure why not then in 10,000 years we can go get the oil for free.

wouldn't that make us the terrorists?

unless we had one of those racially smart bombs like they used in New Orleans on the levy.

2007-12-24 09:36:29 · answer #4 · answered by truthteller 4 · 1 0

Nope Make love not war

2007-12-24 11:28:14 · answer #5 · answered by 0 2 · 0 0

How ignorant! Aren't you an American? Don't you know that the American government doesn't destroy anything if there's a buck to be made?

2007-12-24 09:38:25 · answer #6 · answered by Ninny Imposter 4 · 1 0

No NO NO NO NO
It will work out without NUKES

2007-12-24 10:37:55 · answer #7 · answered by NIFman 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers