If OJ Simpson's didn't kill Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, Who do you think really did?

Question

In 1994 OJ Simpson was found not guilty and he can thank his lawyer Johhny Cochran who past away a few years ago. Do you think OJ was telling the truth to all of us that he didn't kill them, Why or why not?

I personally don't think he did it himself. He might of told someone to do it. But he said he didn't kill them and if did he would be lying. And lying is a bad thing to do.

Answer 1

don't worry, oj's still looking for the real killer. apparently, the real killer plays a lot of golf, so oj's hot on his trail.

Answer 2

There were other suspects initially, raising issues that were never addressed at trial, as the prosecution did not meet its burden of proof.
Citizen said:
> Usually with "unsolved" crimes alternative theories emerge. New suspects are found. None of that happened in the Simpson case.

Not true. Check the early news stories.

Nicole's friends were supposedly heavily not some drug dealers for serious money at the time, or something like that IIRC.

That is plenty of motive for lots of people (not necessarily the friends). Most of who would likely be nameless and not likely to stay in this country for long.

I guess we will never know unless the friends end up dying "unusual" deaths.

Answer 3

But OJ lost the civil suit big time. Everybody knows he did it even though he was found to be "not guilty" in the criminal trial.

Usually with "unsolved" crimes alternative theories emerge. New suspects are found. None of that happened in the Simpson case.

Joyel22 OJ could not take the 5th in the civil trial. Once a criminal court finds you to be "not guilty" then you can't take the 5th Amendment.

Answer 4

Your question is silly since OJ was later found legally liable for CIVIL damages. This is a case where civil and criminal courts have different standards of evidence. What they had was not enough to convict him of criminal charges, but was more than enough for him to take the brunt of the civil charges. To this day, any money he makes beyond a certain limit goes to the Goldman family.

Answer 5

Lying might be a bad thing, but if he was already killing, lying is nothing.

If OJ Simpson didn't do it, I think it must have been Grapefruit Juice Simpson, OJ's twin but with a bit more sour of an attitude.

Answer 6

Maybe his son did it. I would give that about one chance in a thousand. It is at least 99.9% likely of OJ doing it. I am probably being generous at the odds of the kid killing her and OJ covering up after him.

Answer 7

He did kill them and he as much as admitted to it by writing a smug book about how he would have killed them if he had.

What kind of man, who insists he did not kill the mother of his children, writes a book about how he WOULD HAVE killed the mother of his children???

I'll tell you what kind. A smug man who not only got away with cold-blooded murder, but who also is heartless enough to not take his own kids' feelings into consideration when he decides to write his "gloating" novel about the murder of their mother.

I don't care if he had help or not. Fact is, he's guilty. By the way, he LOST the civil suit and was ordered to pay up.... so no, he was not found entirely innocent.

Who do I think REALLY killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman? Ummmm. O.J. Simpson.

Answer 8

OJ's looking for the killers! On the golf course.

Answer 9

It's possible that third guy and the police may have been involve, and that OJ can afford to do anything he wants.

Answer 10

I say he did do it, because if he was innocent then why did he keep taking the 5th amendment. In the civil trial he wasn't allowed to take it and was found guilty. He also has a record of beating his wife. I was always told: "If it walks like a duck and looks like a duck, it's a duck."