English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

29 answers

lmao lol, lol, lol, lol. This is a joke right??!!!!!!!
How cute! A baby's bum with sh** all over it!!! I guess some very peculiar people might go for that look! The flies would be unwelcome guests though I would imagine. uggh YUK!
lol, lol, lol, lmao, lol.

2007-12-22 14:06:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'm sorry what... Huggies thongs, no I would not.

That doesn't make a lot of sense babies wear pampers b/c they are not potty trained. So you expect me to put a string up there bum for what exactly?

2007-12-22 14:03:44 · answer #2 · answered by ♥PirplePashn♥ 6 · 0 0

well the point of a huggie is so the poop goes in the diaper not on the floor, so a thong would be kinda pointless

2007-12-22 14:02:22 · answer #3 · answered by xoxo 6 · 0 0

No. I don't think a thong would provide enough protection or be absorbant enough for a baby to shi* or pi** in.

2007-12-22 14:01:46 · answer #4 · answered by christina30 6 · 0 0

Of course - who would want their child walking around with panty... or actually, diaper lines. They are sooo unsightly and soooo NOT cool...

You've got to be kidding me!?

2007-12-22 14:11:17 · answer #5 · answered by muchluv4pets 4 · 0 0

Is that dare whatcha calls one of dem dare oxymoron

2007-12-22 14:02:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That would kinda defeat the purpose , wouldn't it?

2007-12-22 14:04:12 · answer #7 · answered by Sophie B 7 · 0 0

I hope no one ever invents these! What a mess that would make . . .

2007-12-22 14:02:30 · answer #8 · answered by terrigrace 1 · 0 0

good luck with the absorbency thing

2007-12-22 14:01:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I'm afraid they would leak

2007-12-22 14:02:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers