lmao lol, lol, lol, lol. This is a joke right??!!!!!!!
How cute! A baby's bum with sh** all over it!!! I guess some very peculiar people might go for that look! The flies would be unwelcome guests though I would imagine. uggh YUK!
lol, lol, lol, lmao, lol.
2007-12-22 14:06:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry what... Huggies thongs, no I would not.
That doesn't make a lot of sense babies wear pampers b/c they are not potty trained. So you expect me to put a string up there bum for what exactly?
2007-12-22 14:03:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by ♥PirplePashn♥ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
well the point of a huggie is so the poop goes in the diaper not on the floor, so a thong would be kinda pointless
2007-12-22 14:02:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by xoxo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I don't think a thong would provide enough protection or be absorbant enough for a baby to shi* or pi** in.
2007-12-22 14:01:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by christina30 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course - who would want their child walking around with panty... or actually, diaper lines. They are sooo unsightly and soooo NOT cool...
You've got to be kidding me!?
2007-12-22 14:11:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by muchluv4pets 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is that dare whatcha calls one of dem dare oxymoron
2007-12-22 14:02:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would kinda defeat the purpose , wouldn't it?
2007-12-22 14:04:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sophie B 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope no one ever invents these! What a mess that would make . . .
2007-12-22 14:02:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by terrigrace 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
good luck with the absorbency thing
2007-12-22 14:01:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm afraid they would leak
2007-12-22 14:02:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋