Just what is it about Hillary that has made her the primary target of Republican mudslinging?
Q: What would be your economic policy?
A: Not socialism, unlike Hillary Clinton
Q: Who would you nominate as ambassador to the UN?
A: Not that b*tch Hillary Clinton
Q: How's your wife?
A: Sweet and submissive, unlike Hillary Clinton.
I mean, I could understand the neocon obsession with her if her record was that of a flaming liberal (ooh, how...progressive) but she's the most conservative democrat running, except for John Edwards.
What gives???
2007-12-22
13:47:31
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Once again, I'll ask: why is Hillary targeted when her record is no more liberal than her fellow democrats, and is more conservtive than most?
I don't remember saying Hillary was a conservative, only that she is one of the more conservative democrats.
Reading comprehension rocks.
2007-12-22
14:34:55 ·
update #1
koalatco,
So your primary objection to Hillary is that her husband had an affair?
2007-12-22
14:36:41 ·
update #2
Adolf, in one breath, you accuse her of being for "big government" and criticize her defense of women's reproductive freedom. Being a member of the conservative camp myself, I really object to your being irrational and making the rest of us look bad.
2007-12-22
14:39:20 ·
update #3
Wow. This is great. The primary objection to Hillary seems to be that she's socialist (you guys should research what REAL socialism is) and that her husband had an affair. That, and not being able to comprehend that my calling her the most conservative democrat running in no way means I'm calling her a CONSERVATIVE, period. Come on guys, I know you can do better!
2007-12-22
14:42:26 ·
update #4
Defiler, "your" is possessive. I think you want "you're", which is a contraction of "you" and "are".
2007-12-22
14:43:47 ·
update #5
Okay, she changes her speeches to suit her audience. (I though this was taught in middle school communication class, but maybe I'm wrong.) She plays dirty. I was sort of looking for something which all other politicians DON'T do, since my question asks specifically about her in particular.
2007-12-22
14:46:39 ·
update #6
you want to know about her record...FINE ILL TELL YOU. any sane sober individual would have to have been living under a rock to believe the "wasnt involved" and "didnt know" lame excuses about the clinton.."legacy"...and even if she didnt know(she did), would you really want someone that clueless in the white house....
THIS WAS GUILT BY PARTICIPATION...NOT BY ASSOCIATION...
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
add travelgate, filegate, whitewater, the vince foster coverup, the health care fiasco, the lincoln bedroom rental, campaign finance fraud 2000 and so on and i think you see my point. not all of us, for your information ascribe to the pelosi;reid regime diatribe. some of us WORKING americans actually think for ourselves. those are the ones who have hillary figured out.
liberals...gotta love em(sic)
2007-12-22 13:57:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
6⤊
3⤋
I doubt that Hillary even knows if she is a Conservative or Liberal Democrat? ......And; if she does know;.I'm pretty certain that her stance changes every other day i.e. on Mondays & Tuesdays she is a Liberal and on Wednesday she is more Conservative, but on Friday she is back to being a Liberal again.---- Re: Hillary....Exactly WHAT record are you referring to ?? As a New Yorker; I can vouch for the fact that as a Senator HILLARY HAS NO RECORD !!---Hillary has NEVER written, drafted, proposed, endorsed, sponsored or even voted on ANY legislation that has ever benefitted New York.-----When Bill was President her sole attempt at sponsoring a proposal as First Lady was her NATIONAL HEALTH CARE PLAN which was a TOTAL FAILURE.- Hillary's " record " has reflected that she has been a TOTALLY INCOMPETENT NY SENATOR ( who completely neglected her duties as NY Senator in order to campaign for President for the past year ). As such; Hillary would make an EVEN MORE INCOMPETENT PRESIDENT.
2007-12-22 23:31:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
She isn't a conservative or a liberal, she is a sell out. She is bought and paid for by big business. Where do you think she got the money to fund her Presidential bid?
Universal Health care is a nice thought... but we can't afford it. We can't even afford social security. She will bankrupt this country worse than ever.
She wants big government and she is bought and paid for by big business. Everyone is excited because she is a woman. Who cares?
You owe it to yourself to check out Ron Paul if you really care about this country.
2007-12-25 00:16:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Your fictional Q & A is almost a classical push poll. I've known conservatives all my life and I've not known any to refer to Ms. Clinton as a b*tch. You almost sound like you work for her campaign, or for Air America. i would say she is extremely polarazing and has worked hard to earn her high negative rating. Should she earn the Democratic nomination (unlikely at this point), she will have the highest rating of a prospective candidate in history. She has shown socialistic tendancies, she is a viscious back-biter, and the history of Clinton politics shows her ability to play dirty. Why do they attack her? Obama isn't worth the effort. Even Ron Paul could defeat an inexperienced candidate like him. Nominating Hillary Clinton would be a gift the Republicans couldn't beg for.
2007-12-22 22:29:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by marikfalconsword 2
·
5⤊
6⤋
Do you know anything about how she would like to run National Health care? That is far from conservative, almost socialist. If you think she is conservative you must be one of the most leftist people alive. Wow! Republicans don't like her for MANY reasons. She changes her views from city to city. She changes her SPEECH from city to city. There have been reports of how mean and nasty she is to her employees. She lies. She appears to me to be evil. How can someone stay with a spouse like Bill after what he so publicly did to her? That shows extreme weakness or she stayed with him for reasons of power. Either way she can't be trusted.
Add: Wow. I really object to you being so condescending to people who took the time to answer your question. So what if someone said your instead of you're? You are so petty you needed to point this out? Your parsing of words really sucks too. You said she was the most conservative democratic candidate. Obviously to almost EVERYONE who answered it sounded like you were saying she has conservative tendencies. You want to know what gives? It's certainly NOT you giving any real information.
2007-12-22 22:12:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cinner 7
·
6⤊
5⤋
Watch her latest ad on T.V. She is taking things from under the Christmas tree and reading them. Everything she reads is tax raising or a socialist program. Such as the pre school program that will be paid for by taxpayers.
2007-12-22 22:02:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by ohbrother 7
·
6⤊
5⤋
Mudslinging? Sorry but what ever is stated about Hillary is based on facts! When I call her a pro-amnesty tax raising socialist, that's the truth. Truth is not mud slinging.
In addition, she is her own worst enemy at times. For example, she whines about how the boys were picking on her when she didn't answer the question about DL for illegals. Excuse me but she did that to herself.
Your Q&A is your fabrication. And, if you think she's conservitive, you're nuts!
2007-12-22 21:53:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
10⤊
6⤋
"republicans" afraid of Her , they want anyone but Her , number One in Her Debate Team and Valedictorian , "they" are afraid to debate Her , I'd Marry Her , Women should have the Right to more than one husband , just as claim in other countries to more than one Wife , oh Hillary XOXO he he , : ) but Hope
at least Obama spoke against Embargo against Cuba , if any Embargo , Embargo Cat and Kitten massacre "china" with ICBMs pointed at U.S.
use search youtube under cat massacre china
2007-12-23 00:36:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Courageous Capt. Cat 3
·
2⤊
6⤋
she interned for the CPUSA, she has never run so much as a corner store, she voted for the war, and then to de-fund the troops. And she wont answer tough questions.
Among other things she is a shrewed cold calculating ambitious politician who thinks that its her "turn" to be the president
2007-12-22 21:52:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ancient Warrior DogueDe Bordeaux 5
·
9⤊
5⤋
Conservative?!! Ha! In what regards?? She is a big government nanny state liberal with socialist views, is pro choice.... C'mon help us understand your logic!
2007-12-22 22:01:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Adolf Schmichael 5
·
7⤊
7⤋