that Daniel Radcliffe gets paid more than Rupert Grint and Emma Watson (from Harry Potter movies) eventhough the three of them are key or important (whatever you want to call them) characters of the story.
I personally think is unfair, they should all get paid the same, they come out together in almost every scene.
2007-12-22 13:29:19 · 21 answers · asked by Forgotten 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
....................Edit................
ok for those of who are talking about who much they get paid, that's not really the point. It doesn't matter if they get paid 20 millions or just 1 ( which I know they don't) It's about getting paid the same. And for sodafreak, Rupert and Emma just got paid 4 millions and Daniel got paid like 10 or 15 millions, for 5th film. That is a big difference between the paychecks.
2007-12-22 13:43:52 · update #1
That is how the movie machine works.
The headliner (the person whose name is most large on the movie poster and advertisements) is always paid more.
That is life and I am surprised I have to give this news to you: LIFE'S NOT FAIR!
And please remember that they are just actors, dear. Nothing more. They are all paid too much for what they do for a living.
2007-12-22 13:32:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most of the time whoever plays the lead; the hero; the title character -- all of which Daniel Radcliffe qualifies as -- gets the top salary. That's just the way it is. It doesn't matter if you are a great actor in your opinion and he sucks @ss, or if you're in the movie as much as he is, etc. They make you an offer and you can try to negotiate if you want to but most of the time if it's reasonable you just take what they offer. Those actors must think it's fair or they wouldn't be in the movies.
2007-12-22 21:34:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think it's pretty fair because Dan's the one who does most of the stunts. For example, in the fourth movie, he was the one who fought the dragon, and he's the one who plays quidditch. Yes, it is true that Rupert and Emma are important charecters, but I think that it is fair that Dan gets paid more than them.
2007-12-22 21:35:02 · answer #3 · answered by ohhsnap! 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Theya re a trio, but HE is Harry Potter. Without him coming back the whole series will unravel quickly! They are all important, but teh other two are just slightly more replaceable, ya know? So basically, yeah it's fair!
2007-12-22 21:32:30 · answer #4 · answered by okeydokeyjal22 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
NO!
The movie is called Harry Potter!
Harry met the guy first, he gets 2nd money
Then he met Hermioni last
2007-12-22 21:33:55 · answer #5 · answered by danica ^^ 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
how unfair.
but i guess its because "harry potter" is the main part of all the publicity (the books named after him, so is the movies).
but i think rupert is sometimes a better actor then daniel..
2007-12-22 21:34:30 · answer #6 · answered by watching the sunset 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but i've come to learn that a lot of things in life just aren't fair.
2007-12-22 21:32:51 · answer #7 · answered by ehhh 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it is unfair but the movies are named after daniels character and he is what they are about mostly
2007-12-22 21:32:28 · answer #8 · answered by rachel 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think it is fair, he should get paid a bit more, but not that much more...
2007-12-22 21:32:26 · answer #9 · answered by rb23 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Radcliffe has a better agent...
2007-12-22 21:32:35 · answer #10 · answered by Sophie B 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋