English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think it was a bad and irresponsible choice and ended up with a
end to her future but would not be surprised after she is Brittney's
sister.

2007-12-22 11:04:17 · 20 answers · asked by Hayley M 2 in Society & Culture Holidays Christmas

20 answers

People are acting like she's the only 16 year old who has ever done this.

There, but for the grace of God, go many of us!

However, I hope her mother gives up on writing that book about bringing up children.

2007-12-22 11:18:52 · answer #1 · answered by kiwi 7 · 0 0

All I can say is "She's a Spears." Perhaps they were not very rooted in morality. It's such a waste to get pregnant at 16. How can you enjoy the single life anymore? Besides, even if it was a consensual act, since Jamie Lynn is still 16 and her boyfriend 19, it is still considered rape whether the girl agreed or not.

2007-12-22 19:08:01 · answer #2 · answered by inquisitor01 2 · 1 0

It has nothing to do with being a persons sister. There are a lot of sibling combos where one is bad and the other is normal so thats not always true. I do think it is very irresponsible though as she was a huge role model to young girls and knowing this she should have been a lot more careful with the choices she was making in her life because so many young girls watch her and do what she does.

2007-12-22 19:08:23 · answer #3 · answered by ehrlich 6 · 0 0

sure it was a bad choice on her part but guess what if she wasnt a star in the spot light anyone she met wouldnt make a big deal out of it. people only make a big deal because she is a tv star. it isnt an end to her future. she made a wrong choice and she has to live with it. and who are you to judge her. maybe she wasnt thinking when it happened. things like this happen to girls all across the world and people dont make a big deal out of it. but when it happens to a star and it is the end of the world.

2007-12-22 19:10:33 · answer #4 · answered by Stephanie 6 · 1 1

well, being a "spears" gives you much more freedom to do whatever you want. They have the money to do it. Therefore, i disagree. It is NOT irresponsible because you can afford to raise the child in a relatively wealthy family.

2007-12-22 19:07:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I think its unfortunate for both her and the baby. She's a child herself and has no idea how to raise a child. The baby will suffer and Jamie will suffer as well.

2007-12-22 19:07:59 · answer #6 · answered by that hot chick 6 · 2 0

She is just one of 4 million 16-year-olds that will get pregnant this year.

2007-12-22 19:09:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

have a heart she is a normal 16 year old girl. it doesn't matter who her sister is. in the UK its legal to be married and have kids so coming from the UK i don't see a problem with it. my mum was 16 when she had my bro and i think she managed fine. i wish her all the luck in the world.

2007-12-22 19:13:05 · answer #8 · answered by Beau 2 · 1 1

I think it's shameful and sad. Girls need to realize that what they see on tv is not what people are like in real life.

2007-12-22 19:10:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Choice? I don't think getting pregnant was chosen. But really, i find it hillarious.

2007-12-22 19:11:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers