Edwards.
Everyone's wealth except his own, that is...
2007-12-22 08:06:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
At least Brian Moore say's he's a socialist, unlike the current bunch of "marxists" running for the democratic nomination. Basically you can pick any democrat and you can guarantee that they're socialists.
Ever wonder why Comrad Hitlerey Klinton has her college thesis blocked from public view.... could it be because it will prove what a marxist wacko she really is?
2007-12-22 08:28:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by G T 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Edwards or maybe Kucinich. By the way it is not possible to " redistribute wealth" Wealth is not distributed in the first place, it is earned. I think that the proper phrase is Taking money away from those who earned it and giving it to those who didn't.
2007-12-22 08:21:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Michael 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Goooo Edwards
2007-12-22 08:07:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by MadLibs 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Probably Brian Moore, the presidential candidate from the Socialist Party USA.
2007-12-22 08:16:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Manuel B 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Edwards
2007-12-22 08:12:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Locutus1of1 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well it sure isnt a Conservative candidate.
Hillary already said she would like to take oil company profits, so I would guess it would be her.
I have totally ignored Edwards, so I wouldnt know about his stand although I wouldnt be surprised if it were him.
I earn my money. If others want money they can damn well earn it too, and it isnt the governments job to provide lifetime handouts to lazy bums with our money.
2007-12-22 08:29:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by dave b 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Edwards. Except for trial lawyers of course.
2007-12-22 08:12:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think it's Clinton. She wants to distribute all the men's wealth.
2007-12-22 08:08:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by DOOM 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
The shillary, hands down.
2007-12-22 11:26:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ken B 6
·
2⤊
0⤋