English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=dzUNvEfYDEQ&feature=related

Better if you watch it all (1-19)

2007-12-22 07:56:17 · 7 answers · asked by fgheuas 1 in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

yes, i believe that the way they came down it was almost like a planned demolition, but as far as who did it, who knows, did our government have to have some knowledge of it, absolutely, but that does not necessarily mean that they were behind it, they had knowledge of Pearl Harbor to, it was a way for them to get into the war. I'm glad you posted this question because it led to other links as well, which I looked at; the simplest answer is, there will never be a true answer, and dwelling on this does nobody any good, because you cannot change the world, no matter how much you would like to, I think a faith in God that whoever was resposible will be held accountable is all that anyone can hope for, the truth may be uncovered some day, but assuredly not for many many years and there is no point in decieving yourself into thinking you can change the world

2007-12-22 08:15:42 · answer #1 · answered by Girly Q 4 · 1 3

What was wrong was fully fueled jet liners crashing into buildings.

Yes, something happened on the ground floor and basement - tons of fuel poured down the breached elevator shafts. When they go to the bottom, the enflamed fuel and the resultant fireball went back up and out, explosively.

No mystery, no conspiracy. There was tons of speculation going on with little information. An explosion - a bomb? Who knows, maybe.... hence the reporting. Until one knows what actually happened - oh, flaming fuel down the shafts, that explains it - no bomb.

Get a life.

To the person above, building 7 was hugely damaged when the towers nearby collapsed, and then it burned with no suppression for hours. No mystery there, either.

Hey bodie, do the following calculus for me, genius - how much remaining fuel is 20% (of the original 31 TONS or 34 TONS - depending on which plane)? How much fuel poured down a narrow shaft like an evevator shaft would be needed to cause an explosion when it hit on the bottom?

Duhhhh, that's right.

2007-12-22 16:09:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 2 1

As much as I would love to waste my time watching , it would appear that this is just another 911 truth video. I don't care. This 911 truth movement is stupid on the face of it and my opinion is that you must be a weak minded conspiracy idiot to buy into it.Would you guys go join a cult or something and leave the sane people alone? And take Alex Jones with you.

2007-12-22 16:12:11 · answer #3 · answered by Michael 6 · 3 3

I've seen these testimonies and many more...

It's good of you to keep asking questions because we obviously don't all share the same facts.

I know someone who was in the towers at the time. He didn't even find out about building 7 until this year... now he feels lied to because he trusted the news to be honest with him.

2007-12-22 16:05:33 · answer #4 · answered by rabble rouser 6 · 0 3

Oh Jeeze. Not another conspiracy theory. It happened as reported, deal with it. Rosie is lying.

2007-12-22 19:33:11 · answer #5 · answered by Ken B 6 · 0 0

It's amazing that some Moron's (andrew m) refuse to believe there own Eye's...p.s. 80% of all the Fuel went up in the crash of the plane...

2007-12-22 16:20:42 · answer #6 · answered by bodie 3 · 1 3

I don't trust the Govt. and the media which they control.

2007-12-22 16:25:49 · answer #7 · answered by Dave M 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers