She perfectly represents modern Democrats.
2007-12-22 07:23:55 · 14 answers · asked by a bush family member 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She represents the wacko far-left democrats!
2007-12-22 07:26:45 · answer #1 · answered by jelle 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Great question! She seems the logical choice of the big-tent party. After all look at all the left wing loons they pander to and the power they wield, especially when it comes selecting good federal judges. If a judge believes in judicial restraint they are often disparaged and opposed by the Dems because they are so controlled by the Rosie O'Donnells of the far left.
2007-12-22 15:39:57 · answer #2 · answered by ace 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Her mouth is bigger than her words. Half the time she makes no sense. She just tries to get the spotlight. You know how they are when they've been up there and slowing diminishing behind the clouds. Her mouth is the only thing going for her because she has no talent. That I know of.
2007-12-23 00:31:16 · answer #3 · answered by Mouth of the South 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can't spell donkey with out dyke. If the modern democrats are loud and pain in the asses then she would be a perfect candidate.
2007-12-22 15:40:26 · answer #4 · answered by HAGAR!!! 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She'd be the perfect Veep for Chillary.
2007-12-22 15:33:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Sure, if Ann Cloutier would run for the neo cons
2007-12-22 15:29:18 · answer #6 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Because even liberals like me cannot STAND that woman!
2007-12-22 15:28:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because she is too liberal for him, but not for me. Her brother is my State Assemblyman in NYC
2007-12-22 15:37:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why should they? They have some wonderful candidates. Here's the best one:
http://johnedwards.com/watch/raitt-browne/
2007-12-22 15:27:12 · answer #9 · answered by notyou311 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
And a lot smarter than Bush
2007-12-22 15:30:24 · answer #10 · answered by golfer7 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋