English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-22 05:12:37 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

They'er both murderers.

2007-12-22 05:24:39 · update #1

21 answers

both are worst case

2007-12-22 09:21:21 · answer #1 · answered by Bharat 5 · 0 0

Time plays a huge factor in setting impressions for anyone.
9/11 made Bush very big.
Bombings in Pakistan are making Musharraf big.
'We' just need to survive. In my opinion, these men are doing what 'they' deem right. And that is right.
Few might say Bush is the worse, others might say Musharraf and some might have no opinion at all. I say all of you are correct on your parts. It is not Bush's fault that Osama bin Laden was born in his time. Or Musharraf's fault that Pakistan was named as a terrorist country in his time!

2007-12-22 13:32:19 · answer #2 · answered by Khan 2 · 0 0

You have passed the judgement on both already. You simply want to know the "worse" one out of the two.
My answer is neither is bad.They are good in their own ways......both are with a mission to destroy terrorism and it's root(s).Bush initiated this and Musharraf is his most trusted partner in arms.
If starting the job of elimination of terrorism is bad than Bush is worse than Musharraf.
I , however, don't support your view in this matter.

2007-12-22 13:40:05 · answer #3 · answered by bikashroy9 7 · 1 0

Definitely Mr Bush..doesnt mean tht Mr Musharraf is nt worse.

2007-12-23 19:16:40 · answer #4 · answered by Alien 4 · 0 0

This question is George W. Bush's fault. Like everything else apparently. Clearly Musharraf is the lesser of two evils (yes I said it). Osama yo mama is in that country somewhere and he's not doing anything about it. I'm a moderate Repub., but even Obama, not to be confused with Osama, said he would look into taking action in Pakistan to find Osama. Hm?

2007-12-22 13:20:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Bush has no fault of his own to be who he is, the lack of education and the minimal interest of the common American leave much to desire about the guy.
Musharraf of the same make, his dictatorship methods of pursuing his goals make him the Asian Bush by imitation.

2007-12-22 13:22:59 · answer #6 · answered by LEE DA 4 · 0 1

Bush is worse because he has been the murderer of many peoples lives.

2007-12-22 13:58:12 · answer #7 · answered by A 2 · 0 1

Both of them are worse to their people. There may be a small degree of variance. Both of them do not have faith in democracy and people's rights. In one word both of them are proved themselves against mankind.

2007-12-23 09:20:23 · answer #8 · answered by virinchi 2 · 0 0

Bush

2007-12-22 13:16:15 · answer #9 · answered by mc 6 · 3 4

Musharraf - since he won't capture OBL even though he's likely there in his midst!

2007-12-22 13:16:09 · answer #10 · answered by Constitutional Watchdog 7 · 3 1

Both shall be burried under carpet of hate.

2007-12-22 23:17:59 · answer #11 · answered by GargVK 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers