Let me ask YOU something: If the Reichstag fire had NOT been an inside job (as it turned out it was), would this have, in your opinion, justified any more so the actions taken by Hitler and the Nazi regime in response to the supposed terrorist incident? Really think about it for a moment.
Likely the answer is NO. Same deal with 9/11. Regardless of who was actually responsible for the Sept 11 attacks, the response both before and after were entirely inappropriate. Ending the policies of perpetual militarism and empire is what matters. It still mattered even before Sept 11.
2007-12-22 05:05:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Search first before you ask it 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
These people are hilarious.
"You crazy conspiracy kooks need to take your meds and take off your tin foil hats."
* Yet they believe 19 amateur pilots could hit 75% of their targets - even though experienced pilots can't do it in simulators.
* They just happened to pick the day Norad was running hijacking drills.
* They were able to plant explosives in WTC7 to bring it down, even though WTC7 housed the CIA, SEC, IRS, Secret Service, Salomon Smith Barney, AMEX, and the Mayor's office of emergency management among others. An amazing feat for foreign terrorists, don't you think?!
* Jet fuel (basicaly kerosene) burns hot enough to melt steel. That's my favorite. How in the f$#k do you barbecue? LOL your grill would collapse into its footprint whenever you preheat it.
And they call us "conspiracy kooks?" What the f$#k do you think the official story is - a non-conspiracy? LOL
9/11 Commissioners don't even believe their own report!
The NIST doesn't believe their own report!
Yet these people believe it!? How?
It's amazing they can turn on a computer.
~OR~
They're part of the cover-up.
More facts:
Pearl Harbor was NOT a surprise.
The Gulf of Tonkin incident never happened.
The Reichstag fire was an inside job.
The anthrax murders are still "unsolved."
Osama bin Laden is NOT wanted for 9/11.
Israel attacked the USS Liberty.
The 7/7 London mastermind was working for British Intelligence.
Khalid Sheikh Muhammad's "confession" is useless and not credible.
Osama bin Laden's "confession" is a sloppy forgery.
2007-12-22 09:02:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by doug4jets 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't believe everything your see and read.
Get the brain going on common sense theory.
1. Planes going that fast into an immovable building are not
going to have fuel stay compacted in one space. It will
fly all over the place. Will cause explosions with anything
that has electrical current, cigarette in ash tray, etc.
2. They must have had many thousands of gallons of fuel
left when they hit the building. Can't you just imagine
the temperatures of those fires. You saw the result.
3. With 50,000 people working there and perhaps
150,000 or more going there daily I would think if someone saw something strange going on they would
notify security in the building. It would probably take
a few days to wire a building to cause the size of
that implosion.
Just give it some thought.
2007-12-22 06:01:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jane D 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Is Michael Moore at it again? How could anyone, with all the evidence fall prey to a YouTube question like this? It is so ridiculous that it would be laughable if it wasn't for the facts, and the tragic deaths that occured by an enemy without a real army, or a country.
Inside Job? No one would be able to convince me of this or the families of those who died that know the real facts.
Thank you, and try to have a "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"
.
2007-12-22 05:00:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Moody Red 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
I first saw that about a year ago! It makes you realize what a cover up the 911 commission was! What really got me going was when I read retired FBI agent Coleen Rowleys public statements at Patroitsquestion911.com! About how FBIHQ obstructed their terrorism investigation of the 20th hijacker Moussaoui by denying them FISA warrants!
Especially when you keep in mind the CIA warned Bush a month before the attack!
2007-12-22 04:48:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Sorry to say, you are gullible.
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html
http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/PDFfiles/Chapter%20VI%20Materials%20&%20Structures.pdf
http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/
I could give you more links, but you get the point.
Knew I would get a thumbs down. Especially since it's been about 3-4 minutes since I give people links from MIT. Enough time to review the links? No. I've watched the CT stuff. Pure nonsense. Try some real analysis from the premier technology institution in America.
2007-12-22 04:53:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by robling_dwrdesign 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
Ya and have you seen the big foot and Nessie video? Just kidding man but no loose change is a stupid conspiracy. If our government really attacked our selves killing thousands of its own citizens, wouldn't they have killed the creators of loose change before it ever got big? I mean honestly why would they stop at 9/11?
2007-12-22 04:39:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jordan L 1
·
3⤊
4⤋
There is a WHOLE damn lot of stuff that has been covered up about 9/11. I personally think it was an inside job by the intelligence agencies like the CIA & Mossad (and the Pakistani one), as the more you look into it the evidence is right there in clear view.
If you like that video you HAVE to check this one out, about the 7/7 attacks in London. It HAS to be an inside job.
http://www.livevideo.com/video/CTCC/A4C62936F0294BE4BD69B7E235E65B67/7-7-ripple-effect.aspx
Oh and look up Operation Northwoods, it was Department of Defence plans to commit False-flag acts of terrorism against US citizens in the 60s, as a pretext to rally mass support against Cuba for war, by hijacking aeroplanes and crashing them into buildings!!!
2007-12-22 04:42:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
6⤋
Anyone who believes in the conspiracy theory is a fool.
2007-12-22 04:39:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by farmboy702003 5
·
4⤊
5⤋
The video missed a vital point.
The 3 buildings were not destroyed by fire. Two of them had a more lethal destroyer.
A large aircraft.
2007-12-22 04:41:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sherlock 6
·
6⤊
5⤋